BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

    No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
    Thank you very much for your support!



    BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

    European Court of Human Rights


    You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Gorica ARSOVSKA v the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia - 29984/06 [2008] ECHR 1795 (2 December 2008)
    URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2008/1795.html
    Cite as: [2008] ECHR 1795

    [New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]



    FIFTH SECTION

    DECISION

    Application no. 29984/06
    by Gorica ARSOVSKA
    against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

    The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 2 December 2008 as a Chamber composed of:

    Peer Lorenzen, President,
    Rait Maruste,
    Karel Jungwiert,
    Renate Jaeger,
    Mark Villiger,
    Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre,
    Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, judges,
    and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar,

    Having regard to the above application lodged on 10 July 2006,

    Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case.

    Having deliberated, decides as follows:

    THE FACTS

    The applicant, Ms Gorica Arsovska, is a Macedonian national who was born in 1956 and lives in Stip. She was represented before the Court by Mr M. Marolov, a lawyer practising in Stip. The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R. Lazareska Gerovska.

    The application concerns administrative proceedings in which the applicant claimed unemployment allowance. The period to be taken into consideration started at the beginning of 1998 when the applicant lodged her appeal in respect of the Štip Employment Bureau decision of 15 December 1997. The proceedings in question ended with the Supreme Court’s judgment of 25 October 2006.

    COMPLAINTS

    The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention that her case had not been heard within a reasonable time.

    THE LAW

    On 10 July 2008 the Court received the following declaration from the respondent Government:

    I, Radica Lazareska Gerovska, Agent of the Government, declare that the Government of the Republic of Macedonia offer to pay ex gratia 2,400 euros to
    Ms Gorica Arsovska with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights.

    This sum, which is to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be converted into Macedonian Denars at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.”

    On 26 June 2008 the Court received a declaration, duly signed by the applicant, which read, inter alia, as follows:

    I, Gorica Arsovska, the applicant, note that the Government of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia are prepared to pay me ex gratia the sum of 2,400 euros with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights ... I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in respect of the facts giving rise to this application. I declare that this constitutes a final resolution of the case.”

    The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no public policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it should be struck out of the list.

    For these reasons, the Court unanimously

    Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

    Claudia Westerdiek Peer Lorenzen
    Registrar President



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2008/1795.html