BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
European Court of Human Rights |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Buchberger against Austria - 32899/96 [2010] ECHR 2250 (2 December 2010) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/2250.html Cite as: [2010] ECHR 2250 |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
Resolution
CM/ResDH(2010)153
1
Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
Buchberger against Austria
(Application No. 32899/96, judgment of 20 December 2001, final on 20 March 2002)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);
Having regard to the judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become final;
Recalling that the violations of the Convention found by the Court in this case concern the breach of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life in that custody of her sons was transferred to the Youth Welfare Office without sufficiently involving her in the decision-making process (violations of Articles 8 and 6, paragraph 1);
Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgment;
Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee’s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;
Having satisfied itself that, within the time-limit set, the respondent state paid the applicant the just satisfaction provided in the judgment,
Recalling that a finding of violations by the Court requires, over and above the payment of just satisfaction awarded by the Court in its judgments, the adoption by the respondent state, where appropriate:
- of individual measures to put an end to the violations and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures, preventing similar violations;
DECLARES, considering the decision taken at the 841st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies (17 June 2003), that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case and
DECIDES to close the examination of this case.
1 Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 2 December 2010 at the 1100th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies