[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	European Court of Human Rights
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> A.M.O. v Denmark - 34036/11 [2012] ECHR 919 (22 May 2012) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/919.html Cite as: [2012] ECHR 919

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

FIRST SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 34036/11
A.M.O.
against Denmark

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 22 May 2012 as a Chamber composed of:

Khanlar Hajiyev, President,
Peer Lorenzen,
Julia Laffranque, judges,
and André Wampach, Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 17 September 2010,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

PROCEDURE

The applicant, A.M.O, is a Syrian national, who lives in Denmark. The President of the Section has granted the applicant’s request that his identity should not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 3). He was represented before the Court by Ms Mary Lisa Jayaseelan, a legal adviser for the Danish Refugee Council (Dansk Flygtningehjælp), an NGO. The Danish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Thomas Winkler, and their Co-agent, Ms Nina Holst-Christensen.

FACTS

On 8 November 2009 the applicant entered Greece and applied for asylum in vain.

On 4 January 2010 he entered Denmark and requested asylum.

On 31 March 2010, the Immigration Service (Udlændingeservice) found that the applicant should be returned to Greece pursuant to the Dublin Regulation. The decision was upheld by the Ministry for Refugee, Immigration and Integration Affairs (Ministeriet for flygtninge, indvandrere og integration).

The applicant was returned to Greece on 17 August 2010.

The applicant re-entered Denmark, it appears in October 2010.

The applicant complained that to return him to Greece was in violation of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.

On 2 November 2011 the Government submitted a friendly settlement declaration in which they stated inter alia:

“...Taking into account the ruling of the Court in M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC] [no. 30696/09, 21 January 2011], and having regard to the specific circumstances of the present case, the Government proposes to pay the applicant 185,000 Danish Kroner (DKK). This amount is intended to compensate the applicant for any non-pecuniary damage he may have suffered as a result of the decision of the Danish authorities to return him to Greece under the Dublin Regulation.

The Government is also prepared to compensate the applicant for necessary and reasonable costs and expenses incurred in relation to the proceedings before the Court, the amount to be determined by the Court...”

On 3 January 2012 the applicant’s representative submitted a declaration in which she stated, inter alia,:

“...[the applicant] wishes to accept the friendly settlement of DKK 185,000 as a compensation for the non-pecuniary damage he has suffered as a result of his return to Greece by the Danish authorities...

...there are no claims [for costs and expenses]”

THE LAW

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It notes that the sum DKK 185,000 is payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government must pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.

The Court is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

André Wampach Khanlar Hajiyev
Deputy Registrar President