KURILENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 18369/18 (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Second Section Committee) [2023] ECHR 859 (02 November 2023)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

European Court of Human Rights


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> KURILENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 18369/18 (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Second Section Committee) [2023] ECHR 859 (02 November 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2023/859.html
Cite as: [2023] ECHR 859

[New search] [Contents list] [Help]


 

 

SECOND SECTION

CASE OF KURILENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 18369/18 and 50 others -

see appended list)

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT
 

STRASBOURG

2 November 2023

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.


In the case of Kurilenko and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

 Lorraine Schembri Orland, President,
 Frédéric Krenc,
 Davor Derenčinović, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 12 October 2023,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE


1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.


2.  The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS


3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.


4.  The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during criminal proceedings against them. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

  1. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS


5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

  1. JURISDICTION


6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).

  1. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLEs 3 and 13 OF THE CONVENTION on account of placement in a metal cage in the courtroom


7.  The applicants complained principally about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."

Some applicants also complained that they had not been afforded an effective domestic remedy in respect of their grievances under Article 3, contrary to Article 13 of the Convention, reading as follows:

"Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity."


8.  The Court notes that the applicants were kept in a metal cage in the courtroom in the context of their trial. In the leading cases of Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts) and Vorontsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 59655/14 and 2 others, 31 January 2017, the Court already dealt with the issue of the use of metal cages in courtrooms and found that such a practice constituted in itself an affront to human dignity and amounted to degrading treatment prohibited by Article 3 of the Convention.


9.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants' confinement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them amounted to degrading treatment.


10.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.


11.  Having regard to the above finding, the Court does not consider it necessary to deal separately with the applicants' complaints under Article 13 of the Convention (see Valyuzhenich v. Russia, no. 10597/13, § 27, 26 March 2019).

  1. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW


12.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-08, 22 May 2012, concerning conditions of detention during transport; Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-156, 9 April 2019, regarding the lack of an effective remedy in respect of the complaint about conditions of detention during transport; and Chaldayev v. Russia, no. 33172/16, § 66-83, 28 May 2019, concerning restrictions in connection with family visits for prisoners detained on remand and differential treatment in that respect).

  1. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION


13.  Article 41 of the Convention provides:

"If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party."


14.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Vorontsov and Others, cited above), the Court considers that the finding of a violation in application no. 18369/18 will constitute in itself sufficient just satisfaction (see Ivanov and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 44363/14 and 2 others, § 12, 4 June 2020, and Puzanov v. Russia [Committee], nos. 26895/14 and 2 other applications, § 13, 15 September 2022). It further finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table to the remaining applicants.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

  1. Decides to join the applications;
  2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants' complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
  3. Declares the applications admissible;
  4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the applicants' placement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them;
  5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table);
  6. Holds that it is not necessary to examine separately the applicants' complaints under Article 13 of the Convention about the absence of a domestic remedy to complain about placement in a metal cage in courtrooms;
  7. Holds that the finding of a violation constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for the non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicant in application no. 18369/18;
  8. Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the remaining applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 2 November 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

 Viktoriya Maradudina Lorraine Schembri Orland
 Acting Deputy Registrar President

 


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention

(use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant's name

Year of birth

 

Representative's name and location

Name of the court

Date of the relevant judgment

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)[1]

  1.    

18369/18

13/03/2018

Anatoliy Yuryevich KURILENKO

1989

 

 

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

29/09/2017

 

The finding of a violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction

  1.    

26113/18

27/05/2018

Timur Narimanovich UZBEKOV

1990

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

Privolzhskiy Circuit Garrison Court of Tatarstan

08/12/2017

 

5,500

  1.    

26771/18

20/05/2018

Yevgeniy Valentinovich CHAYKA

1967

Laptev Aleksey Nikolayevich

Moscow

Meshchanskiy District Court of Moscow

29/12/2017

 

5,000

  1.    

28334/18

14/12/2018

Vitaliy Romanovich MIKITIN

1978

 

 

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

27/06/2018

 

7,500

  1.    

46995/18

10/09/2018

Sergey Vladimirovich MISHIN

1970

 

 

Justice of the Peace of Syktyvkar

13/06/2018

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - train on 27/10/2018 - 28/10/2018, involving overnight stay without an allocated individual sleeping place (see Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, § 127, § 133, 9 April 2019), overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to potable water. 

8,500

  1.    

47302/18

21/02/2019

Denis Mikhaylovich SIDORENKOV

1972

 

 

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk

17/01/2019

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - in convoy cells of the Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, from 17/01/2018 to 26/08/2019 (overcrowding, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to running water);

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport

8,500

  1.    

50217/18

04/10/2018

Boris Vladimirovich KUNITSYN

1989

Andreyev Ashot Aleksandrovich

Syktyvkar

Syktyvkar Town Court of the Komi Republic

11/05/2018

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - numerous occasions of transport by prison van (overcrowding) since 29/06/2015 and until the applicant's release on 11/05/2018;

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport

6,200

  1.    

50296/18

04/10/2018

Yevgeniy Grigoryevich KAYDO

1986

Andreyev Ashot Aleksandrovich

Syktyvkar

Syktyvkar Town Court of the Komi Republic

09/04/2018

 

7,500

  1.    

56524/18

07/11/2018

Aleksey Viktorovich LICHUTIN

1979

Andreyev Ashot Aleksandrovich

Syktyvkar

Syktyvkar Town Court of the Komi Republic

11/05/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

57713/18

29/10/2018

Galina Nikolayevna AFANASYEVA

1993

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Surgut Town Court of the Khanty-Mansy Region

09/06/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

58921/18

26/11/2018

Dmitriy Sergeyevich ILYUKHIN

1992

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

 

Verkhneuslonskiy District Court of the Tatarstan Republic

10/07/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

59050/18

20/04/2019

Andrey Aleksandrovich MENSHIKOV

1994

 

 

Kalininskiy District Court of Tyumen

27/11/2018

Art. 8 (1) - restrictions on family visits in pre-trial facilities - SIZO-1 Tyumen, limitation on the frequency of short-term family visits, physical separation and supervision during short-term family visits, refusal of long-term family visits. The applicant was detained in SIZO between 15/03/2017 and 09/04/2019.

 

Art. 14 - in conjunction with Art. 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits

9,750

  1.  

59594/18

26/11/2018

Igor Olegovich BEREZOVSKIY

1991

 

 

Verkhneuslonskiy District Court of the Tatarstan Republic

07/08/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

1229/19

08/12/2018

Ruslan Anatolyevich GAZDAROV

1990

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Justice of the Peace of Tobolsk

31/07/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

1748/19

07/12/2018

Aleksandr Andreyevich YEFREMOV

1997

 

 

Tobolskiy District Court of the Tyumen Region

16/08/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

2970/19

08/12/2018

Vladimir Vladimirovich BOGATYREV

1983

 

 

Tobolsk Town Court of the Tyumen Region

29/08/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

3897/19

04/01/2019

Yevgeniy Vladislavovich ZHELTOVSKIY

1994

 

 

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Tobolsk Town Court of the Tyumen Region

23/11/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

4867/19

23/11/2018

Andrey Sergeyevich IGUSHEV

1979

 

 

Ukhta Town Court of Komi Republic

31/07/2020

 

Ukhta Town Court of the Komi Republic; Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

18/09/2020

 

Syktyvkar Town Court of the Komi Republic

22/04/2021

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

 

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - on 23/11/2018, by train - insufficient number of sleeping places, overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or insufficient electric light; on 23/11/2018, by van - 0.6 sq. m., overcrowding, lack of or insufficient electric light; on 24/11/2019, by van - overcrowding

8,500

  1.  

6084/19

08/01/2019

Anatoliy Vyacheslavovich TSINKALOV

1997

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Tyumen Regional Court

12/11/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

6808/19

08/01/2019

Vitaliy Vitalyevich VOYTSEKHOV

1991

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Tyumen Regional Court

12/11/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

7047/19

14/01/2019

Azat Rifatovich TIMERZYANOV

1993

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Tsentralnyy District Court of Tyumen;

Tyumen Regional Court

24/07/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

7396/19

24/12/2018

Nina Fedorovna TRAPSH

1944

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Kalininskiy District Court of Tyumen

31/10/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

7548/19

06/01/2019

Ilsur Inzilovich IDIYATULIN

1970

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Bavly Town Court of the Tatarstan Republic

20/07/2018;

 

Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic

02/10/2018

 

 

7,500

  1.  

8993/19

14/01/2019

Gennadiy Olegovich ISTOMIN

1998

Sarmasin Damir Fazylzhanovich

Orsk

Dzerzhinskiy District Court of Orenburg

20/11/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

9077/19

22/01/2019

Rinaz Azatovich KHASHIMOV

1988

 

 

Tobolsk Town Court of the Tyumen Region

20/09/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

9844/19

22/01/2019

Georgiy Nikolayevich BORCHA

1992

 

 

Yarkovskiy District Court of the Tyumen Region

01/08/2018;

 

Tyumen Regional Court

27/09/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

10883/19

04/02/2019

Ruslan Lyufizovich SAYAFAROV

1992

 

 

Surgut Town Court the Khanty-Mansy Region

05/10/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

11751/19

28/01/2019

Aleksandr Anatolyevich PUYSHIS

1991

Lukyanova Svetlana Anatolyevna

Khanty-Mansiysk

Neman Town Court of the Kaliningrad Region

06/12/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

11801/19

28/01/2019

Vasiliy Borisovich KOLGANOV

1958

Berdiyev Artem Artykovich

Samara

Samarskiy District Court of Samara

04/09/2018

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport

 

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - by van, 22/09/2016 - 04/09/2018, 0.2 sq. m., lack of fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet, overcrowding, poor quality of potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, numerous occasions of transport from the detention facility to the courthouse

8,500

  1.  

11852/19

28/01/2019

Mikhail Viktorovich NASENNIK

1983

 

 

Surgut Town Court of the Khanty-Mansy Region

27/08/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

12239/19

28/01/2019

Nikolay Sergeyevich NIKITENKO

1986

Lukyanova Svetlana Anatolyevna

Khanty-Mansiysk

Neman Town Court of the Kaliningrad Region

06/12/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

12241/19

28/02/2019

Maksim Viktorovich NIKITIN

1994

Lukyanova Svetlana Anatolyevna

Khanty-Mansiysk

Neman Town Court of the Kaliningrad Region

06/12/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

12790/19

16/02/2019

Yevgeniy Sergeyevich DUBROVIN

1992

Lukyanova Svetlana Anatolyevna

Khanty-Mansiysk

Tobolsk Town Court of the Tyumen Region

02/10/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

13742/19

19/02/2019

Sergey Sergeyevich POPOV

1998

 

 

Kalininskiy District Court of Tyumen

18/09/2018;

 

Tyumen Regional Court

01/11/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

14965/19

07/03/2019

Mikhail Andreyevich VAGANOV

1987

Lukyanova Svetlana Anatolyevna

Khanty-Mansiysk

Kalininskiy District Court of Tyumen

18/12/2018;

 

Zavodoukovskiy District Court of Tyumen

16/01/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,500

  1.  

15519/19

22/04/2019

Aleksey Vladislavovich NECHAYEV

1993

Balog Natalya Andreyevna

Krasnoyarsk

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

27/06/2018

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport on numerous occasions from the detention facility to the courthouse during the period between 24/08/2016 and 24/10/2018; by van and detention in a transit cell, severe overcrowding, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient natural light, no access to potable water, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet, passive smoking;

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport

8,500

  1.  

16826/19

12/03/2019

Aleksey Aleksandrovich KUKUSHKIN

1979

 

 

Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk

21/11/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

18023/19

12/03/2019

Sergey Aleksandrovich STIKHARNYY

1973

 

 

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

26/04/2019

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

 

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by train and detention in transit cells from transport by train and detention in transit cells from 02/02/2019 to 23/02/2019; 0.3 sq. m. of personal space; overcrowding, passive smoking, insufficient number of sleeping places, no or restricted access to toilet

8,500

  1.  

18153/19

22/03/2019

Vitaliy Fedorovich KARPOV

1985

Lukyanova Svetlana Anatolyevna

Khanty-Mansiysk

Tsentralnyy District Court of Tyumen

10/01/2019;

 

Tyumen Regional Court

26/02/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

18506/19

27/03/2019

Aleksandr Lazarevich ARTYUSHKIN

1986

Lukyanova Svetlana Anatolyevna

Khanty-Mansiysk

Surgut Town Court the Khanty-Mansy Region

11/10/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

19437/19

27/03/2019

Aleksey Sergeyevich KOZHARIN

1974

Petrov Roman Nikolayevich

Cheboksary

Cherepovets Town Court, Vologda Regional Court

10/12/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

19711/19

29/03/2019

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich SEMENOV

1984

 

 

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk

10/12/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

20331/19

29/03/2019

Anastasiya Andreyevna KORNEVA

1998

Lukyanova Svetlana Anatolyevna

Khanty-Mansiysk

Kalininskiy District Court of Tyumen

18/03/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

21607/19

05/04/2019

Dmitriy Maksimovich KARAPATS

1979

 

Smolninskiy District Court of St Petersburg

15/02/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

23379/19

02/04/2019

Sergey Aleksandrovich MITSKEVICH

1991

Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich

Nizhniy Tagil

Ordzhonikidzevskiy District Court of Yekaterinburg; Sverdlovsk Regional Court

18/01/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

24005/19

18/04/2019

Aleksandr Sergeyevich BYRKA

1986

 

 

 

Koneva Nina Filippovna

Khanty-Mansiysk

Leninskiy District Court of Tyumen

26/03/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

24439/19

22/04/2019

Vitaliy Sergeyevich SIPYAGIN

1987

 

 

Inta Town Court of the Komi Republic

02/04/2018

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by train and van from the pre-trial detention facility to the temporary police ward in another town to take part in the investigative actions; proceedings are still pending; transport on-going; insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient electric light, passive smoking

8,500

  1.  

24933/19

15/04/2019

Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich KORYTKO

1986

 

 

Dzerzhinskiy District Court of Orenburg

30/11/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

25538/19

21/04/2019

Roman Yevgenyevich NOVITSKIY

1992

 

 

Nefteyuganskiy District Court of the Khanty-Mansy Region

13/11/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

25602/19

18/04/2019

Yevgeniy TABAK

1995

Koneva Nina Filippovna

Khanty-Mansiysk

Nefteyuganskiy District Court of the Khanty-Mansy Region

16/01/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

26586/19

18/04/2019

Rustam Sultanovich GORBAKOV

1987

Magomadov Andarbek Sharanovich

Moscow

Gagarinskiy District Court of Moscow

08/04/2019

 

7,500

 

 


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2023/859.html