KULVINSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 28133/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Third Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 117 (08 February 2024)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

European Court of Human Rights


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> KULVINSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 28133/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Third Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 117 (08 February 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/117.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 117

[New search] [Contents list] [Help]


 

 

 

THIRD SECTION

CASE OF KULVINSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 28133/21 and 22 others -

see appended list)

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT
 

STRASBOURG

8 February 2024

 

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

 


In the case of Kulvinskaya and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

 Peeter Roosma, President,
 Ioannis Ktistakis,
 Andreas Zünd, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 18 January 2024,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE


1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.


2.  The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS


3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.


4.  The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

  1. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS


5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

  1. JURISDICTION


6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).

  1. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION


7.  The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.


8.  The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).


9.  In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.


10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".


11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.

  1. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW


12.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.


13.  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.

  1. REMAINING COMPLAINTS


14.  Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the above findings, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.

  1. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION


15.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

  1. Decides to join the applications;
  2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
  3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;
  4. Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
  5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
  6. Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 8 February 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

 

 Viktoriya Maradudina Peeter Roosma
 Acting Deputy Registrar President

 


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention

(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant's name

Year of birth

Representative's name and location

Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative / criminal charges

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)[1]

  1.    

28133/21

17/05/2021

Natalya Eduardovna KULVINSKAYA

1961

Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo

Barnaul

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Barnaul

 

23/01/2021

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Barnaul

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

 

40 hours of community work

Altai Region Court

17/03/2021

 

 

 

 

Altai Regional Court

16/06/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings;

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - 1) escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 23/01/2021 until 24/01/2021;

2) escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 21/04/2021

4,000

  1.    

41690/21

29/07/2021

Viktor Aleksandrovich NEMYTOV

1982

Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko

Mytishchi

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

02/02/2021

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

02/02/2021

 

Anti-war protest

 

Moscow

 

27/02/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

 

detention of 30 days

 

 

 

 

 

detention of 28 days

Moscow City Court

16/04/2021

 

 

 

 

Moscow City Court

09/02/2021

 

 

 

 

Moscow City Court

01/03/2022

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of the administrative-offence proceedings;

 

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - 1) escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report (twice in one day);

2) escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 27/02/2022 until 28/02/2022;

 

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentences of administrative detention imposed on the applicant (on two occasions) were executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

6,000

  1.    

50436/21

21/09/2021

Nikolay Mikhaylovich NOVIKOV

1987

Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko

Mytishchi

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

31/01/2021

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

29/06/2021

 

 

 

 

Moscow City Court

25/05/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 and 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.    

52681/21

30/09/2021

Svetlana Valeryevna LOZOVSKAYA

1975

 

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Ulan-Ude

 

23/01/2021

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Ulan-Ude

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 20,000

Supreme Court of the Buryatia Republic

05/04/2021

 

 

 

Supreme Court of the Buryatia Republic

12/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 and 31/01/2021 for compiling offence reports;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.    

54522/21

14/10/2021

Aleksandr Vladimirovich MASLOV

2000

Aleksey Sergeyevich Lapuzin

Samara

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Samara

 

23/01/2021

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Samara Regional Court

15/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.    

55130/21

15/10/2021

Konstantin Valeryevich NADEIN

1968

 Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

St Petersburg

 

23/01/2021

 

Anti-war protest

 

St Petersburg

06/03/2022

article 8.6-1 § 2 of St Petersburg Law on Administrative Offences

 

 

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 4,000

 

 

 

 

 

detention of 7 days

Oktyabrskiy District Court of St Petersburg

23/06/2021

 

 

 

St Petersburg City Court

07/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - 1) escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

2) escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 06/03/2022 until 07/03/2022;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings

 

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.

5,000

  1.    

61277/21

01/12/2021

Irina Anatolyevna LEVCHENKO

1964

Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov

Vilnius

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Krasnoyarsk

 

23/01/2021

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Krasnoyarsk

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 10,000

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

08/07/2021

 

 

 

 

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

10/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings

 

 

4,000

  1.    

22/22

26/11/2021

Yegor Igorevich VASILCHENKO

2001

Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov

Yekaterinburg

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Yekaterinburg

 

30/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

20 hours of community work

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

16/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 19/02/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.    

28/22

26/11/2021

Kirill Mikhaylovich GAVRIKOV

1988

Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov

Yekaterinburg

Women's rights rally

 

Yekaterinburg

 

08/03/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

11/08/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

3,500

  1.  

34/22

26/11/2021

Aygizar Alfatovich ASFANDIYAROV

1989

Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov

Yekaterinburg

Women's rights rally

 

Yekaterinburg

 

08/03/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

21/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 08/03/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

37/22

26/11/2021

Anna Anatolyevna LUKASHENOK

1990

Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov

Yekaterinburg

Women's rights rally

 

Yekaterinburg

 

08/03/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

27/07/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

3,500

  1.  

99/22

07/12/2021

Aleksandra Andreyevna KLEVTSOVA

1987

Yelena Yuryevna Pershakova

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Perm

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Perm Regional Court

08/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 28/01/2021 for questioning and on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

279/22

02/12/2021

Mikhail Mikhaylovich BULYGIN

1992

Aleksey Valeryevich Vlasov

Tula

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Tula

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Tula Regional Court

21/05/2021 (final decision served on the applicant on 02/06/2021)

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report

4,000

  1.  

336/22

10/12/2021

Andrey Vladimirovich KRAYEV

1983

Andrey Olegovich Valenkov

Nizhniy Novgorod

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Nizhniy Novgorod

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 5,000

Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court

17/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

363/22

24/11/2021

Nikita Aleksandrovich VOVK

2000

Viktor Valeryevich Kochenkov

Izhevsk

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Izhevsk

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Udmurtia Republic

24/05/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

425/22

26/11/2021

Maksim Pavlovich BENEKHIN

1994

Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova

Nizhniy Novgorod

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Nizhniy Novgorod

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court

27/05/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

3481/22

14/12/2021

Anna Antonovna ROMANOVA

1995

Daniil Alekseyevich Polyakov

Voronezh

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Voronezh

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 12,000

Voronezh Regional Court

15/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

3506/22

10/12/2021

Arina Andreyevna MAKHMUDOVA

1999

Luiza Magomedovna Magomedova

St Petersburg

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

St Petersburg

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

15/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

3533/22

18/12/2021

Daniil Aleksandrovich IVANOV

1995

Yelena Yuryevna Pershakova

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Moscow

 

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

21/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

37202/22

12/07/2022

Yelizaveta Vadimovna KRUPENINA

1994

Sergey Aleksandrovich Loktev

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest

 

St Petersburg

 

26/02/2022

 

Anti-war protest

 

St Petersburg

 

28/02/2022

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

12/04/2022

 

 

 

 

St Petersburg City Court

12/06/2022

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings;

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 26/02/2022 until 27/02/2022 and from 28/02/2022 until 01/03/2022

4,000

  1.  

48484/22

16/09/2022

Oleg Petrovich ORLOV

1953

Irina Aleksandrovna Yatsenko

Moscow

Anti-war protest

 

Moscow

 

26/02/2022

 

Anti-war protest

 

Moscow

 

06/03/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

01/07/2022

 

 

 

 

Moscow City Court

07/07/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 26/02/2022 and 06/03/2022 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

  1.  

48650/22

30/09/2022

Aleksandra Vladislavovna KOZICHEVA

1996

Mariya Sergeyevna Zyryanova

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest

 

St Petersburg

 

08/03/2022

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

31/05/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 08/03/2022 until 09/03/2022;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

4,000

  1.  

50123/22

13/10/2022

Aleksandr Anatolyevich STREPETOV

1968

Nataliya Andreyevna Baranova

Moscow

Anti-war protest

 

St Petersburg

 

04/03/2022

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

St Petersburg City Court

14/06/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 04/03/2022 for compiling an offence report;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000

 

 


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/117.html