POLEZHAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 59040/18 (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Fourth Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 18 (11 January 2024)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

European Court of Human Rights


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> POLEZHAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 59040/18 (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Fourth Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 18 (11 January 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/18.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 18

[New search] [Contents list] [Help]


 

 

 

FOURTH SECTION

CASE OF POLEZHAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 59040/18 and 41 others -

see appended list)

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

STRASBOURG

11 January 2024

 

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

 


In the case of Polezhayev and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

 Branko Lubarda, President,
 Armen Harutyunyan,
 Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 30 November 2023,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE


1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.


2.  The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS


3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.


4.  The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

  1. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS


5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

  1. Jurisdiction


6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).

  1. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 3 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION ON ACCOUNT OF CONFINEMENT IN A METAL CAGE IN THE COURTROOM


7.  The applicants complained principally about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

"No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."

Some applicants also complained that they had not had an effective domestic remedy in respect of their grievance under Article 3, contrary to Article 13 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

"Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity."

 


8.  The Court notes that the applicants were kept in a metal cage in the courtroom in the context of their trial. In the leading cases of Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts) and Vorontsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 59655/14 and 2 others, 31 January 2017, the Court already dealt with the issue of the use of metal cages in courtrooms and found that such a practice constituted in itself an affront to human dignity and amounted to degrading treatment prohibited by Article 3 of the Convention.


9.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants' confinement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them amounted to degrading treatment.


10.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.


11.  In view of the above findings under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the applicants' complaints under Article 13 of the Convention (for similar approach see Valyuzhenich v. Russia, no. 10597/13, § 27, 26 March 2019).

  1. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW


12.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-08, 22 May 2012; and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-156, 9 April 2019, concerning inadequate conditions of transport and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect).

  1. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION


13.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Vorontsov and Others, cited above), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

  1. Decides to join the applications;
  2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
  3. Declares the applications admissible;
  4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the applicants' placement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them;
  5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table);
  6. Holds that it is not necessary to deal separately with the applicants' complaints under Article 13 of the Convention related to the lack of an effective domestic remedy to complain about placement in a metal cage in courtrooms;
  7. Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 11 January 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

 

 Viktoriya Maradudina Branko Lubarda

 Acting Deputy Registrar President

 

 


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention

(use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant's name

Year of birth

 

Representative's name and location

Name of the court

Date of the relevant judgment

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1]

  1.    

59040/18

26/11/2018

Sergey Vasilyevich POLEZHAYEV

1956

Isayev Ayndi Khamzatovich

Krasnoyarsk

Kansk Town Court of the Krasnoyarsk Region

28/06/2018

 

7,500

  1.    

1646/19

02/12/2018

Sergey Viktorovich NIKITIN

1992

Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich

Nizhniy Tagil

Berezovsk Town Court of the Sverdlovsk Region

31/08/2018

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - train, 10/10/2018-12/10/2018, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of fresh air, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient quantity of food

8,500

  1.    

3122/19

26/11/2018

Arsen Stepanovich DUKH

1999

 

 

Pechora Town Court

01/10/2018

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - by train between 30/07/2018 and 18/12/2018); insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to toilet, passive smoking

8,500

  1.    

4028/19

04/01/2019

Aleksandr Yevgenyevich VERSHININ

1988

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Tobolsk Town Court of the Tyumen Region

15/10/2018

 

7,500

  1.    

4082/19

04/01/2019

Aleksandr Sergeyevich SKOKOV

1991

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Tobolsk Town Court of the Tyumen Region

15/10/2018

 

7,500

  1.    

4603/19

04/01/2019

Artur Ramizovich ALIYEV

1987

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Tobolsk Town Court of the Tyumen Region

09/11/2018

 

7,500

  1.    

4693/19

04/01/2019

Aleksandr Yuryevich MARTYNOV

1986

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Tsentralnyy District Court of Tyumen

25/10/2018

 

7,500

  1.    

4784/19

05/01/2019

Oleg Yuryevich MAMONOV

1972

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Leninskiy District Court of Tyumen

05/09/2018

 

7,500

  1.    

4886/19

04/01/2019

Anatoliy Valeryevich GURYANOV

1974

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Tobolsk Town Court of the Tyumen Region

15/10/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

4969/19

04/01/2019

Aleksandr Sergeyevich BASKAKOV

1989

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Tobolsk Town Court of the Tyumen Region

15/08/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

5143/19

24/12/2018

Sergey Romanovich MIKITIN

1975

 

 

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

28/06/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

5621/19

09/01/2019

Lada Aleksandrovna GALEYEVA

1987

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Novo-Savinovskiy District Court of Kazan; Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic

07/12/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

5791/19

09/01/2019

Albert Denisovich RAKHMATULLIN

1990

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Kirovskiy District Court of Kazan

11/07/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

5873/19

09/01/2019

Irek Azgarovich SHAYKHULMARDANOV

1992

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Novo-Savinovskiy District Court of Kazan; Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic

05/10/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

6216/19

04/01/2019

Sergey Viktorovich VAGITOV

1974

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Tobolsk Town Court of the Tyumen Region

23/10/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

6227/19

28/12/2018

Aleksandr Yuryevich KOMAROV

1961

Chernyavskaya Andzhelika Viktorovna

Oktyabrskiy

Tsentralnyy District Court of Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk Regional Court

23/08/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

6828/19

04/01/2019

Vitaliy Valentinovich KASHIRTSEV

1979

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Neman Town Court of the Kaliningrad Region

08/11/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

6957/19

08/01/2019

Fanis Gabbasovich NURULLIN

1965

Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich

Tyumen

Nizhnekamsk Town Court; Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic

18/12/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

7757/19

23/01/2019

Dmitriy Liveryevich CHEREPANOV

1969

Balog Natalya Andreyevna

Krasnoyarsk

Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk; Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

also via video-link from SIZO-1 Krasnoyarsk

24/07/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

10256/19

04/02/2019

Yekaterina Sergeyevna KHOMYAKOVA

1997

 

 

Surgut Town Court

05/10/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

10670/19

28/01/2019

Anatoliy Sergeyevich GREBENYUK

1983

 

 

Surgut Town Court

27/08/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

11561/19

28/01/2019

Aleksandr Vladimirovich ZHEMIS

1969

 

 

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

09/11/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

12663/19

30/01/2019

Nikolay Vasilyevich GORBUNOV

1988

 

 

Severodvinsk Town Court

20/02/2018,

pending as of 16/09/2022

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - by van on numerous occasions from 13/11/2017 to 10/01/2019; lack of fresh air, overcrowding;

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport

8,500

  1.  

13496/19

16/02/2019

Artem Vasilyevich DEGEL

1991

Lukyanova Svetlana Anatolyevna

Khanty-Mansiysk

Pyt-Yakh Town Court of the Khanty-Mansy Region

18/12/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

13781/19

14/02/2019

Edgar Rudinovich GABRIELYAN

1995

Sarmasin Damir Fazylzhanovich

Orsk

Leninskiy District Court of Orenburg

05/09/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

13866/19

15/02/2019

Vladimir Sergeyevich BARSUKOV

1956

Kuzminykh Konstantin Sergeyevich

St Petersburg

Kuybyshevskiy District Court of St Petersburg

20/03/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

14652/19

01/03/2019

Igor Anatolyevich KHRAMUSHIN

1970

Andreyev Denis Aleksandrovich

Samara

Zheleznodorozhnyy District Court of Samara, Samara District Court of Samara, Samara Regional Court (at the courthouse and via video link from the Cultural Centre of the Ministry of Interior of Samara and Department of Administration of Justice of Samara)

04/09/2018

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - by van on numerous occasions from 27/06/2016 to 04/09/2018; no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient electric light, inadequate temperature, passive smoking;

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport

8,500

  1.  

16501/19

09/03/2019

Yuriy Olegovich GELETA

1999

Lukyanova Svetlana Anatolyevna

Khanty-Mansiysk

Surgut Town Court

20/09/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

17018/19

18/03/2019

Denis Vladimirovich BAKHTIN

1993

 

 

Leninskiy District Court of Tyumen

14/11/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

17130/19

20/02/2019

Rustam Fanizovich KARIMOV

1989

Lukyanova Svetlana Anatolyevna

Khanty-Mansiysk

Nefteyugansk District Court of the Khanty-Mansy Region

29/01/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

17287/19

18/03/2019

Suleyman Dzhabbar ogly ABUZAROV

1967

Alekseyeva Natalya Vasilyevna

Krasnoyarsk

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk

25/09/2018

 

7,500

  1.  

22964/19

11/03/2019

Konstantin Vladimirovich POTAPOV

1991

 

 

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk

08/10/2018

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

 

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - numerous occasions of transport to take part in court hearings; starting since 31/03/2018, pending as of 16/09/2022; van; overcrowding, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient natural light, passive smoking, lack of or insufficient electric light, mouldy or dirty cell

8,500

  1.  

53160/19

16/10/2019

Andrey Vladimirovich CHECHUROV

1984

 

 

Sverdlovskiy District Court of Kostroma

24/07/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

58697/19

17/03/2020

Denis Vladimirovich UTKIN

1993

 

 

Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk

19/09/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

9961/20

04/02/2020

Roman Ayvarsovich MELLIS

1985

 

 

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

Video link from SIZO-1, Syktyvkar

25/11/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

14668/20

30/01/2020

Aleksey Borisovich YEGOSHIN

1973

 

 

 

Vorkuta Town Court of the Komi Republic

03/12/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

15033/20

02/03/2020

Nikolay Elmanovich IBRAGIMOV

1984

 

 

Tsentralnyy District Court of Chita

29/10/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

17223/20

23/03/2020

Anton Aleksandrovich AKSENOV

1992

 

 

Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk

17/12/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

17225/20

20/03/2020

Dmitriy Ivanovich DYUKAREV

1978

 

 

Sverdlovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk

30/12/2019

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport on numerous occasions between the detention facilities and the courthouse since 15/10/2019, pending as of 16/09/2022 and detention in convoy cells of the courthouse; overcrowding, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient quantity of food;

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport

8,500

  1.  

21928/20

29/04/2020

Murad Bayramovich KICHIYEV

1984

Geraskin Eduard Olegovich

Moscow

Vidnoye Town Court of the Moscow Region

21/01/2020

 

 

7,500

  1.  

40477/20

17/08/2020

Igor Viktorovich PTUSHKO

1981

Kalyugin Igor Yuryevich

Stavropol

Ipatovskiy District Court of Stavropol Region

25/02/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

41853/20

04/09/2020

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich ARDABYEV

1981

Isayev Ayndi Khamzatovich

Krasnoyarsk

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

05/03/2020

 

7,500

 

 


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/18.html