TUGANBAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 8254/18 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Second Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 533 (13 June 2024)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

European Court of Human Rights


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> TUGANBAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 8254/18 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Second Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 533 (13 June 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/533.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 533

[New search] [Contents list] [Help]


 

 

 

SECOND SECTION

CASE OF TUGANBAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 8254/18 and 34 others -

see appended list)

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT
 

STRASBOURG

13 June 2024

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.


In the case of Tuganbayev and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

 Lorraine Schembri Orland, President,
 Frédéric Krenc,
 Davor Derenčinović, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 23 May 2024,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE


1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.


2.  The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS


3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.


4.  The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of various public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

  1. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS


5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

  1. JURISDICTION


6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).

  1. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION


7.  The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.


8.  The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).


9.  In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".


11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.

  1. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW


12.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.

13.  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; and Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO).

  1. REMAINING COMPLAINTS


14.  Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 10 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.


15.  The Court has further examined the rest of the complaints raised by the applicants and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

  1. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION


16.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

  1. Decides to join the applications;
  2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants' complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
  3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, and declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible;
  4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
  5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
  6. Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 13 June 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

 

 Viktoriya Maradudina Lorraine Schembri Orland
Acting Deputy Registrar President

 


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention

(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant's name

Year of birth

 

Representative's name and location

Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative charges

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)[1]

  1.    

8254/18

05/02/2018

 

 

 

and

 

 

62360/19

18/11/2019

Arman Askarovich TUGANBAYEV

1998

Preobrazhenskaya Oksana Vladimirovna

Strasbourg;

 

 

 

 

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Anti-corruption rally

 

Moscow

 

26/03/2017

 

 

Opposition rally

 

Moscow

 

05/05/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 150,000

Moscow City Court

14/08/2017

 

 

 

 

 

Moscow City Court

18/06/2019

 

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3 p.m. on 26//03/2017 until 8 a.m. on 27/03/2017, and from 6.30 p.m. on 05/05/2018 until 1.40 p.m. on 06/05/2018;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.

 

6,000

 

  1.    

14963/18

12/03/2018

 

 

 

and

 

 

6955/19

21/01/2019

Aleksey Nikolayevich YEFREMOV

1974

Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich

Moscow;

 

 

 

 

 

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Anti-corruption rally

 

Vladimir

 

12/06/2017

 

 

Opposition rally

 

Vladimir

 

05/05/2018

 

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

community work for 30 hours

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 10,000

Vladimir Regional Court

27/09/2017

 

 

 

 

Vladimir Regional Court

06/09/2018

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.

 

3,500

  1.    

44634/18

03/09/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and

 

 

50509/18

10/10/2018

Sergey Leonidovich GRIVKO

1986

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Rally in support of A. Navalnyy's

candidacy for the 2018 presidential elections

 

Rostov-on-Don

 

24/12/2017

 

 

Opposition rally

 

Rostov-on-Don

 

05/05/2018

 

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Rostov-on-Don

 

09/09/2018

 

 

Article 20.2

§ 6.1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

 

 

 

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

detention for 6 days

 

 

 

 

 

detention for 2 days

 

Rostov Regional Court

13/03/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rostov Regional Court

11/05/2018

 

 

 

Rostov Regional Court

26/10/2018

 

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.30 p.m. on 05/05/2018 until 10 a.m. on 06/05/2018, and from 3.26 p.m. on 09/09/2018 until 3.30 p.m. on 10/09/2018;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.

 

6,000

  1.    

50128/18

10/10/2018

Aleksandr Vladimirovich SMIRNOV

1990

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Opposition rally

 

Yaroslavl

 

05/05/2018

 

 

Political rally

 

Yaroslavl

 

20/05/2018

 

 

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Yaroslavl

 

01/07/2018

 

 

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Yaroslavl

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

150 hours of community work

Yaroslavl Regional Court

27/08/2018

 

 

 

 

Yaroslavl Regional Court

06/08/2018

 

 

 

Yaroslavl Regional Court

04/09/2018

 

 

 

 

 

Yaroslavl Regional Court

13/11/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.

 

4,000

  1.    

5247/19

20/12/2018

 

 

and

 

 

42571/21

12/08/2021

 

Mikhail Vyacheslavovich DOLIYEV

1976

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Opposition rally

 

Astrakhan

 

05/05/2018

 

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Astrakhan

 

23/01/2021

 

 

Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 10,000

 

Astrakhan Regional Court

29/06/2018

 

 

 

 

Astrakhan Regional Court

26/02/2021

 

 

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 05/05/2018 and 23/01/2021;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.    

5266/19

21/12/2018

Anatoliy Grigoryevich NOGOVITSYN

1987

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Opposition rally

 

Yakutsk

 

05/05/2018

 

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Yakutsk

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 3 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 30,000

 

 

 

 

detention for 20 days

Supreme Court of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)

28/06/2018

 

Supreme Court of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)

14/09/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.

 

 

5,000

  1.    

6012/19

14/01/2019

Ivan Denisovich FINOGEYEV

1996

 

 

Opposition march

 

Penza

 

05/05/2018

 

 

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Penza

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

 

detention for 10 days

Penza Regional Court

19/07/2018

 

 

 

 

Penza Regional Court

06/02/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - (1) escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 05/05/2018; (2) escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 6.47 p.m. on 13/09/2018 until 2 p.m. on 14/09/2018.

 

 

 

 

5,000

  1.    

8000/19

23/01/2019

Lyudmila Ivanovna FILATOVA

1954

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Opposition rally

 

Smolensk

 

05/05/2018

 

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Smolensk

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 5,000

 

 

 

 

 

community work for 60 hours

Smolensk Regional Court

15/08/2018

 

 

 

Smolensk Regional Court

31/10/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

 

 

3,500

  1.    

13141/19

22/02/2019

 

 

 

and

 

 

49803/19

13/09/2019

Artem Aleksandrovich AGEYEV

1995

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

 

 

 

 

 

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

Opposition rally

 

Krasnoyarsk

 

05/05/2018

 

 

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Krasnoyarsk

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 10,000

 

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

11/10/2018

 

 

 

 

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

21/03/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.15 p.m. until 6.05 p.m. on 05/05/2018;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

13193/19

13/02/2019

 

 

 

and

 

 

47643/19

28/08/2019

 

Alina Sergeyevna IVANOVA

1996

 

Gayazova Regina Fargatovna

Kazan

 

 

 

 

 

Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich

Mytishchi

Opposition rally

 

Moscow

 

05/05/2018

 

 

Political rally

 

Moscow

 

13/05/2019

 

 

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Moscow

 

09/09/2018

 

 

Rally to call for fair elections to Mosgorduma

 

Moscow

 

27/07/2019

 

 

Rally to call for fair elections to Mosgorduma

 

Moscow

 

10/08/2019

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

 

 

 

 

 

detention for 5 days

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 15,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

20/11/2018

 

 

 

 

 

Moscow City Court

30/05/2019

 

 

 

 

Moscow City Court

28/02/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

Moscow City Court

18/10/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

Moscow City Court

22/10/2019

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - (1) escorting to and detention at the police station from 9.20 p.m. on 13/05/2019 until 3.05 p.m. on 15/05/2018; (2) escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 27/07/2019 and 10/08/2019;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.

 

 

 

6,000

  1.  

13509/19

25/02/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Andrey Sergeyevich CHVANOV

1976

Akhtyamova Chulpan Salavatovna

Kazan

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Naberezhnyye Chelny

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic

07/11/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - (1) escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 09/09/2018; (2) escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.05 p.m. on 12/09/2018 until 9.15 a.m. on 13/09/2018;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.

 

4,000

  1.  

14207/19

25/02/2019

Ilmir Rafaelevich SHAKUROV

1986

 

 

Akhtyamova Chulpan Salavatovna

Kazan

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Naberezhnye Chelny

 

09/09/2018

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic

07/11/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. until 6.30 p.m. on 09/09/2018 and from 4.10 p.m. on 12/09/2018 until 2.40 p.m. to 13/09/2018;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

17922/19

18/03/2019

Sergey Aleksandrovich SEMENOV

1988

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Omsk

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Omsk Regional Court

11/12/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 09/09/2018;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

19080/19

25/03/2019

Irina Evertovna SAYKONEN

1956

Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich

Saint-Barthélemy d'Anjou

Political rally

 

St Petersburg

 

01/05/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

25/09/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.30 p.m. until 9.25 p.m. on 01/05/2018;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

19897/19

01/04/2019

Aleksey Anatolyevich FEFELOV

1985

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Protest against retirement age hike

 

St Petersburg

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2

§ 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

25/10/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5 p.m. on 09/09/2018 until 8 a.m. on 10/09/2018;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

19901/19

01/04/2019

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich REMIZOV

1985

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Lipetsk

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Lipetsk Regional Court

08/11/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

3,500

  1.  

20057/19

01/04/2019

 

 

 

 

and

 

9581/20

12/02/2020

Nikita Igorevich IVANOV

1990

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

 

 

 

 

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Krasnoyarsk

 

09/09/2018

 

Rally to call for fair elections to Mosgorduma

 

Moscow

 

27/07/2019

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 15,000

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

17/01/2019

 

 

 

 

Moscow City Court

28/11/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 27/07/2019;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

20286/19

02/04/2019

Ayrat Sergeyevich PANTELEYEV

1991

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

Opposition rally

 

Moscow

 

05/05/2018

 

 

Protest against pension reform

 

Naberezhnye Chelny

 

18/11/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

16/11/2018

 

 

 

 

Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic

30/01/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 05/05/2018;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

21039/19

03/04/2019

Valentin Sergeyevich YAAKSON

1988

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Omsk

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Omsk Regional Court

22/01/2019

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

3,500

  1.  

21041/19

03/04/2019

Aleksandr Anatolyevich TYULENEV

1984

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Omsk

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Omsk Regional Court

15/01/2019

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

3,500

  1.  

21176/19

01/04/2019

Aleksandr Sergeyevich GOLOVENKO

1971

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Belgorod

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

community work for 40 hours

Belgorod Regional Court

29/10/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 09/09/2018;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

21183/19

01/04/2019

Artem Alekseyevich KRYLTSOV

1997

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Protest against retirement age hike

 

St Petersburg

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2

§ 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

25/10/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.10 a.m. until 8 a.m. on 10/09/2018;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

24447/19

08/04/2019

Violetta Andreyevna GRUDINA

1990

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Murmansk

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 150,000

Murmansk Regional Court

21/11/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

5,500

  1.  

28600/19

14/05/2019

Vera Aleksandrovna OLEYNIKOVA

2000

Yelanchik Oleg Aleksandrovich

Moscow

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Moscow

 

10/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

14/11/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 10/09/2018;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

30092/19

29/05/2019

Vadim Vladimirovich YERMAKOV

1985

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

Opposition rally

 

Smolensk

 

05/05/2018

 

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Smolensk

 

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 10,000

Smolensk Regional Court

16/01/2019

 

 

 

Smolensk Regional Court

06/02/2019

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.

3,500

  1.  

49305/19

12/09/2019

 

 

 

and

 

 

44234/21

23/08/2021

 

Gerasim Dmitriyevich ARTEMYEV

1987

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

 

 

 

 

Galeyeva Tatyana Olegovna

Krasnoyarsk

 

Protest against retirement age hike

 

Krasnoyarsk

 

09/09/2018

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Krasnoyarsk

 

31/01/2021

 

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

 

fine of RUB 15,000

 

 

 

 

 

fine of RUB 150,000

 

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

21/03/2019

 

 

 

 

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

 

25/03/2021

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 02/02/2021;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.

 

 

 

5,500

  1.  

51193/19

18/09/2019

Alena Gennadyevna VODOLAGINA

1978

Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich

St Petersburg

Political rally

 

St Petersburg

 

01/05/2019

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

28/05/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 01/05/2019;

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

 

 


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/533.html