BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions) >> Sheptonhurst Ltd v Newham Borough Council. (Free movement of goods) [1991] EUECJ C-350/89 (7 May 1991)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1991/C35089.html
Cite as: [1991] ECR I-2387, [1991] EUECJ C-350/89

[New search] [Help]

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The source of this judgment is the web site of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. The information in this database has been provided free of charge and is subject to a Court of Justice of the European Communities disclaimer and a copyright notice. This electronic version is not authentic and is subject to amendment.
   

61989J0350
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 May 1991.
Sheptonhurst Ltd v Newham Borough Council.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division - United Kingdom.
Interpretation of Articles 30 and 36 of the EEC Treaty - National legislation prohibiting the sale of sex articles from unlicensed sex establishments.
Case C-350/89.
European Court reports 1991 Page I-02387
Pub.RJ Page Pub somm

 
   





++++
Free movement of goods - Quantitative restrictions - Measures having equivalent effect - Legislation prohibiting the marketing of sex articles from certain outlets - Whether permissible
(EEC Treaty, Art. 30)



Article 30 of the Treaty should be construed as meaning that national provisions prohibiting the sale of lawful sex articles from unlicensed sex establishments do not constitute a measure having an effect equivalent to a quantitative restriction on imports.
(The Court' s reply in this judgment is the same as that in its judgment in Case C-23/89 Quietlynn Ltd and Richards v Southend Borough Council [1990] ECR I-3059, which involved substantially identical questions.)



In Case C-350/89,
REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the High Court of Justice, Queen' s Bench Division, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between
Sheptonhurst Limited
and
Newham Borough Council,
on the interpretation of Articles 30 and 36 of the EEC Treaty,
THE COURT (Fourth Chamber),
composed of: M. Díez de Velasco, President of the Chamber, C.N. Kakouris and P.J.G. Kapteyn, Judges,
(The grounds of the judgment are not reproduced.)
in answer to the question referred to it by the High Court, Queen' s Bench Division, by order of 12 October 1988, hereby rules:



Article 30 of the EEC Treaty should be construed as meaning that national provisions prohibiting the sale of lawful sex articles from unlicensed sex establishments do not constitute a measure having an effect equivalent to a quantitative restriction on imports.

 
  © European Communities, 2001 All rights reserved

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1991/C35089.html