BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Burke v Lancashire County Council & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 219 (13 February 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/219.html
Cite as: [2001] EWCA Civ 219

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2001] EWCA Civ 219
B3/2000/3178

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE BLACKPOOL COUNTY COURT
(His Honour Judge Appleton)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2
Tuesday, 13th February 2001

B e f o r e :

LORD JUSTICE HENRY
____________________

JANE DEBORAH BURKE Claimant/Respondent
-v-
(1) LANCASHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL
(2) BLACKPOOL & FYLDE COLLEGE CORPORATION
Defendants/Applicants

____________________

Computer Aided Transcript of the Palantype Notes of
Smith Bernal Reporting Limited
190 Fleet Street London EC4A 2AG
Tel: 020 7421 4040 Fax: 020 7831 8838
(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

Mr Gruffydd (instructed by Messrs Napthen Houghton Craven, Preston, Lancashire) appeared on behalf of the Applicant Defendants.
The Respondent Claimant did not appear and was not represented.

____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

  1. LORD JUSTICE HENRY: On oral renewal of his application before me, Mr Gruffydd, for the applicants here, seeks leave on ground 1(a) of his grounds of appeal, formally abandoning ground 1(b) and ground 2.
  2. In relation to ground 1(a) he joins issue with the Court as to whether it was right, on the facts before the trial court, for this Court to have concluded that on one test the stack of chairs remained upright for six minutes and 50 seconds before collapse. That seemed to me to be so unusual a danger to warrant a warning. But Mr Gruffydd contends that, on the evidence before the trial judge, the longest time before collapse was just 21 seconds, and the six minutes and 50 seconds is a reference to a different or less satisfactory test. First, five chairs were used rather than four; and second, it seems that the stack did not fall in that test but merely slipped. So he challenges the applicability of the basis on which, when refusing leave, I had approached the matter.
  3. It seems to me that there is something in this point. Accordingly, I give leave.
  4. Order: application for permission to appeal granted; costs reserved to the appeal.
    (Order does not form part of approved Judgment)


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/219.html