BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> D (A Child), Re [2001] EWCA Civ 71 (17 January 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/71.html
Cite as: [2001] EWCA Civ 71

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2001] EWCA Civ 71
B1/00/3161

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION
(Mr Justice Stuart White)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2

Wednesday, 17th January 2001

B e f o r e :

LORD JUSTICE THORPE
____________________

D (A CHILD)

____________________

(Computer Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of Smith Bernal Reporting Limited
190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG
Telephone No: 0171-421 4040
Fax No: 0171-831 8838
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

THE APPLICANT appeared in Person.
____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

  1. LORD JUSTICE THORPE: This is an application brought by Mr. D, who lives in Kempston in Bedfordshire, for permission to appeal an order made by Stuart White J on 18th April 1996. The order dismissed an application for a residence order which, if granted, would have had the consequence of discharging a care order, then current. Not only is this application nearly five years stale, but, more importantly, the child in question, 13 years of age at the date of judgment by Stuart White J, is now obviously on the threshold of her majority. Indeed, Mr. D has told me this morning that she will attain her majority next Sunday. It follows as a matter of inevitable logic that this application is doomed to failure, since this court will lose any jurisdiction in relation to Mr. D's daughter before there could be any further judicial process. Mr. D has accepted this reality very sensibly and with both grace and humour. However, there is nothing I can do other than to dismiss the application and to thank him for presenting it in such a sensible way.
  2. Order: Application dismissed.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/71.html