BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Badibanga v Otley College [2002] EWCA Civ 737 (27 March 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2002/737.html
Cite as: [2002] EWCA Civ 737

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2002] EWCA Civ 737
A1/02/0201

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
TO SHOW CAUSE WHY APPLICATION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED


Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2
Wednesday, 27th March 2002

B e f o r e :

DEPUTY MASTER di MAMBRO
____________________

BADIBANGA
- v -
OTLEY COLLEGE

____________________

(Computer Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes
of Smith Bernal Reporting Limited
190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG
Telephone No: 0207-421 4040
Fax No: 0207-831 8838
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________


MR BADIBANGA did not appear and was not represented.

____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

  1. DEPUTY MASTER di MAMBRO: This is an application for permission to appeal, and for an extension of time within which to appeal, the order made by the Employment Appeal Tribunal on 22nd November 2001. On that day the tribunal, under the chairmanship of Mr Clarke, dismissed Mr Badibanga's appeal from the Employment Tribunal sitting at Bury St. Edmunds. The Employment Tribunal decided it did not have jurisdiction to entertain Mr. Badibanga's complaint of unlawful racial discrimination brought against Otley College. The Employment Appeal Tribunal decided that there had been no error of law on the part of the Tribunal.
  2. Mr. Badibanga filed his appellant's notice with the Civil Appeals Office on 10th January 2002. He was instructed to file bundles in support of his application by 18th February. Bundles were not received and on 18th March Mr. Badibanga was informed that his application would be listed for dismissal for failure to provide bundles. It is for that reason that the application is listed before me today.
  3. This court has received a further application from Mr. Badibanga which appears to be closely linked to this application. Under reference number 2001/1496 Mr. Badibanga sought permission to appeal the refusal by Richards J of his claim for judicial review against the Employment Service. Mr. Badibanga is now seeking to reinstate that application. Obviously the two applications do appear to have close links. Bundles have not been received in support of that application, although the Office did receive a letter from Mr. Badibanga dated 19th March, which appears to be a copy of a letter of complaint which he sent to the Parliamentary Commissioner.
  4. I will order that, unless within 21 days he has filed a set of bundles which fully comply with the terms of the bundle leaflet entitled "How to prepare a bundle of documents for the Court of Appeal", a further copy of which should be sent with today's order, his application shall stand dismissed with costs without further order.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2002/737.html