BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Sukul-Lennard v Croydon Primary Care Trust [2003] EWCA Civ 1193 (22 July 2003)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2003/1193.html
Cite as: [2003] EWCA Civ 1193

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2003] EWCA Civ 1193
A1/2002/2437

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM AN EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
(His Honour Judge McMullen QC)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London, WC2
22nd July 2003

B e f o r e :

LORD JUSTICE PETER GIBSON
LORD JUSTICE MANCE
LORD JUSTICE LONGMORE

____________________

SUKUL-LENNARD Claimant/Appellant
-v-
CROYDON PRIMARY CARE TRUST Defendant/Respondent

____________________

(Computer-Aided Transcript of the Palantype Notes of
Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited
190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

MR SUKUL (instructed by Mr Robert Solomon, London SW17 7TR) appeared on behalf of the Appellant.
The Respondent did not appear and was unrepresented.
Tuesday, 22nd July 2003

C O S T S


____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

  1. LORD JUSTICE PETER GIBSON: We are now asked to deal with the question of costs.
  2. It was suggested by the respondent in correspondence that the appeal should be dealt with in the way in which this court has now held it should be dealt with. It was resisted on behalf of Mrs Sukul-Lennard and on that issue, which is a discrete issue, Mrs Sukul-Lennard has lost. True it is that the final outcome of the litigation is unknown, but where there is a discrete issue it is the almost invariable practice of this court to award costs to the successful party unless there are very special circumstances. None such has been suggested in this case.
  3. Accordingly, we think it appropriate that we order Mrs Sukul-Lennard to pay the respondent's costs thrown away by her not accepting the invitation in the correspondence to deal with the matter as the respondent had suggested. But we will add a further direction that that order for costs should not be enforced until the end of the conclusion of the litigation.
  4. Order: As above.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2003/1193.html