BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
England and Wales Family Court Decisions (High Court Judges) |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Family Court Decisions (High Court Judges) >> A Borough Council v N & Ors [2022] EWFC 91 (11 February 2022) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/91.html Cite as: [2022] EWFC 91 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
B e f o r e :
____________________
A Borough Council |
Applicant |
|
-and- |
||
N (Mum) |
1st Respondent |
|
-and- |
||
M (Dad) |
2nd Respondent |
|
-and- |
||
The Children X and Y by their Guardian |
3rd Respondent |
____________________
Ms Kaur for the 1st Respondent
Ms Edwards for the 2nd Respondent
Mr Webb for the 3rd Respondent
Hearing date: 8 – 10 February 2022
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
District Judge Hesford:
What the case is about
Who is everybody?
The background
What does everyone say?
i) She accepts that she has problems working with Social Workers because of what happened when she was a girl, but says that Jeanette has not tried hard enough to work with her.
ii) She does not think that the decision is fair and she has not been given a proper chance.
iii) Things have changed. She agreed that the house conditions were not okay before – but they are better now. She would like a different house if the girls came home.
iv) She wasn't able to do the work with Alison due to her mum and auntie dying and as her grandmother was ill and she was worried and had to look after the horses.
v) She says she can care for X and Y properly with support.
What I have to decide today
Do I need any more information before I decide?
What I think of the evidence
Realistic options
i) send X and Y home to their mum,
ii) delay making my decision, to give N another chance to do more work or go to a Mother and Baby Unit
iii) make a care order so they live with foster parents but are not adopted,
iv) or make care and placement orders.
I have already said that I don't think a delay would be useful. The Guardian says that there is no realistic prospect of N doing the work and maintaining any progress and I agree. It would just be delaying this matter and delay is never good for children. Sadly I do not think that there is any way of letting N look after the girls without constant support. This has been tried and failed before removal.
N was not happy to go to a Mother and Baby Unit in April 2020 and I think that it is now too late to consider that. Also I know that N has actually done this before the legal case started and she went missing sometimes. I don't think it would help me make my decision.
Even if X and Y can't go home I don't think foster care would be the best option for them unless they can't be adopted. If possible they need a family to care for them until they are grown up.
Welfare checklist
My decision
Contact
Other important things
District Judge Hesford 11 February 2022