BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales High Court (Senior Courts Costs Office) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Senior Courts Costs Office) Decisions >> McIlwraith v McIlwraith & Stephens & Bolton [2002] EWHC 9028 (Costs) (24 July 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Costs/2002/9028.html
Cite as: [2002] EWHC 9028 (Costs)

[New search] [Help]


This summary of a judgment has been obtained from the Supreme Court Costs Office pages on the HM Courts Service web site. The citation used by BAILII is not an officially approved citation. The full text of the judgment may have an official Neutral Citation issued by the court, and may be available elsewhere on BAILII.

 

 

No.15 of 2002

McIlwraith v McIlwraith & Stephens & Bolton
24 July 2002
His Honour Judge Rich QC

In this case a beneficiary sought an order from the court for assessment of costs charged to an estate pursuant to Section 71(3) Solicitors Act 1974, even though more than 12 months had elapsed since those costs had been paid.

The Judge, reversing the Chancery Master, held that although the "12 month bar" under Section 70(4) of the Act was certainly quite clear, there was a residual discretion under Section 71(4) to allow assessments in this sort of situation. Section 70(4), although a matter to be taken into account, was not determinative of applications under Section 71(3). Accordingly there was a discretion which should be exercised by the court in the circumstances, but it would be for the applicant who was interested in the bill to persuade the court that he should nonetheless order an assessment and some special circumstances, such as a more timely application, would have to be shown to invoke the court’s discretion.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Costs/2002/9028.html