BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales High Court (Senior Courts Costs Office) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Senior Courts Costs Office) Decisions >> Khan v Anwar [2022] EWHC 2267 (SCCO) (06 January 2022)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Costs/2022/2267.html
Cite as: [2022] EWHC 2267 (SCCO)

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2022] EWHC 2267 (SCCO)
Case No: SC-2021-APP001193

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
SENIOR COURTS COSTS OFFICE

Thomas More Building
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2A 2LL
6 January 2022

B e f o r e :

MASTER BROWN
____________________

SABRINA KHAN

Claimant

- and -

MOHAMMAD ANWAR

Defendant

____________________

Digital Transcription by Epiq Europe Ltd,
Unit 1 Blenheim Court, Beaufort Business Park, Bristol, BS32 4NE
Web: www.epiqglobal.com/en-gb/ Email: [email protected]
(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

SABRINA KHAN appeared in person
MOHAMMAD ANWAR appeared in person

____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT (APPROVED)
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

  1. THE MASTER: I think this application should be struck out. I have heard extensive argument and it seems to be clear there is no jurisdiction for me to hear this matter. If you are to pursue the remedy of an appeal, it seems to me I have given you sufficient indication as to how that might done, although you should not rely upon my advice, you should look it up yourself and take legal advice as appropriate to see what you can do but as far as I can see, the SCCO does not sit on appeal from an FTT judge.
  2. [Judge's note on approving the transcript: I think there may have been more extensive discussion as to why the SCCO lacked jurisdiction in the argument]


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Costs/2022/2267.html