BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
Athlone Travel/Ml Stein [1992] IECA 3 (4th June, 1992)
Competition
Authority Decision of 4 June 1992 relating to a proceeding under Section 4 of
the Competition Act, 1991
Notification
No. CA/12/92 - Athlone Travel Limited/Michael Stein Travel Limited.
Decision
No. 3
Introduction
1. Notification
was made with a request for a certificate under
Section 4(2) of the
Competition
Act, 1991 by Athlone Travel Ltd. in respect of the sale of the business of
Blackpool Holidays to Michael Stein Travel Ltd., on 13 April 1992.
2. Notice
of intention to take a favourable decision was published in the Irish Times on
8 May 1992. No submissions were received from interested parties.
The
Facts
(a) The
Parties Involved
3. Athlone
Travel and Michael Stein Travel are tour operators and travel agents based in
Ireland and engaged in the package tour/holiday business. Blackpool Holidays
was a trade name used by Athlone Travel for specialising in organising tours to
Blackpool. Athlone Travel had operated this business since May 1991 with
outlets in Athlone and at 12 Upper O'Connell Street, Dublin. Michael Stein
Travel has its principal place of business at 77 Lower Camden Street, Dublin.
(b) The
Product and the Market
4. The
agreement concerns the sale of the business of tours to Blackpool. Blackpool
Holidays arranged for travel to and from Blackpool and accommodation there for
its clients. This service is a part of the overall package tour/holiday market
in the sense that Blackpool is one out of a large number of places that
consumers may choose to go for a holiday. There are a number of other firms
who compete in providing tours to Blackpool. These include P.A.B. Travel, Quay
Travel and Arrow Tours. Travel agents would book trips to Blackpool for their
clients through one of these tour operators. In addition it is of course
possible for consumers to arrange trips to Blackpool themselves, by purchasing
boat or plane tickets directly and booking their own accommodation. Blackpool
has to compete, for example, with other British destinations and with package
deals to sun holiday destinations. It has been suggested by the parties that
up to 10,000 people may go to Blackpool from Ireland. In 1991 Blackpool
Holidays arranged trips for approximately 800 people.
The
Agreement
5. The
agreement for the sale and purchase of the goodwill of Blackpool Holidays was
made on 23 March 1992. Under the terms of the agreement Athlone Travel has
agreed not to engage in the business of organising tours to Blackpool for a
period of three years. This provision is set out in clause 3.4 which states:
'that
the Assignor will not during the period of three years from the date hereof
directly or indirectly carry on or be concerned or interested in the business
to which the Goodwill in Ireland relates and the Assignor will use its best
efforts to secure to the Assignee the benefit of the connection and custom
thereof but not so as to be required to waive any expense in so doing. It is
agreed by the assignor that the restrictive covenant hereon is reasonable and
necessary for the legitimate protection of the Goodwill hereby acquired by the
Assignee'.
6. The
First Schedule to the agreement defines the term Goodwill as follows.
'All
the Goodwill attaching to the Business Blackpool Holidays including the
Business and Trade Name "Blackpool Holidays" together with all the intellectual
Property Rights belonging to the business Blackpool Holidays including, without
limitation, the trade marks, registered designs, copyrights and business names
in any part of the world and copyright in all drawings, plans, specifications,
design and computer software owned by the Assignor and used in and for the
purposes of the business and all know how and confidential information so owned
and used.'
Assessment
(a) Section
4(1)
7.
Section
4(1) of the
Competition Act states that 'all agreements between undertakings,
decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which have as
their object or effect prevention, restriction or distortion of competition in
trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of the State are
prohibited and void'.
(b) The
Undertakings and the Agreement
8.
Section
3(1) of the
Competition Act defines an undertaking as 'a person being an
individual, a body corporate or an unincorporated body of persons engaged for
gain in the production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of a
service.' The present decision involves two limited companies engaged in the
business of selling package tours/holidays on the Irish Market. They are both
undertakings within the meaning of
the Act. The agreement for the sale and
purchase of the business of Blackpool Holidays is an agreement between
undertakings within the meaning of
the Act.
(c) Restraints
on Competition
9. In
the Authority's view the only issue arising under the
Competition Act in
respect of this agreement relates to clause 3.4 which restricts Athlone Travel
from re-entering the market for tours/holidays to Blackpool. The Authority has
previously set out its views on such clauses in its decision on Nallen/O'Toole.
[1]
In that decision the Authority indicated that in the case of the sale of a
business some restriction on the seller re-entering the market was necessary in
order to ensure the complete transfer of the goodwill of the business. It
stated that, provided the restriction was limited in terms of its duration,
geographical coverage and subject matter to that: which was necessary for the
complete transfer of the goodwill, then the restriction was not in breach of
Section 4(1) of
the Act. In this respect the Authority's decision was in line
with that taken by the European Commission in a number of cases under Article
85 of the Treaty of Rome on which
Section 4 of the
Competition Act is based.
[2]
10. The
Authority indicated that it would normally regard a time-limit of two years as
being adequate for the transfer of goodwill. It went on to state, however,
that it would accept a restriction of longer duration, where it could be shown
that this was necessary to secure the complete transfer of goodwill. In
Nallen/O'Toole it accepted a restriction of three years.
11. The
present agreement involves a restriction for three years as in Nallen/O'Toole.
The Authority believes that a period of three years is justified in this case
for similar reasons to those outlined in Nallen/O'Toole. Consumers tend to
purchase the products in question infrequently perhaps once a year. In
addition personal contact with customers is an important factor in the
business. The business is relatively small and claims to have had only 800
customers during 1991. In addition, although Athlone Travel only began
operating tours to Blackpool in May 1991, it is still active in the travel
business. It might therefore be relatively easy for it to recapture quickly
its former customers if it were to resume offering tours to Blackpool. For
these reasons it would appear that the period specified in the agreement is no
more than is required to secure the complete transfer of the goodwill.
12. The
restriction is limited in terms of its geographical coverage and subject matter
to that which is necessary for the transfer of the goodwill. Clause 3.4 of the
agreement requires that Athlone Travel not 'directly or indirectly carry on or
be concerned or interested in the business to which the Goodwill in Ireland
relates'.
The
Decision
13. Athlone
Travel and Michael Stein Travel are undertakings within the meaning of
Section
3 of the
Competition Act and the arrangements in question constitute an
agreement which applies within the State.
14. The
Authority believes that the present agreement cannot be considered to prevent,
restrict or distort competition in the State or any part of the State.
15. In
the case of a sale of business, some restriction on the seller is essential in
order to ensure the complete transfer of the goodwill for which the purchaser
has paid. A non-competition clause in a sale of a business agreement which is
limited in terms of duration, geographic coverage and subject matter to what is
necessary to ensure the complete transfer of the goodwill of the business does
not, in the Authority's opinion, prevent, restrict or distort competition. The
Authority believes that the non-competition clause in the present agreement
between Athlone Travel Limited and Michael Stein Travel Limited satisfies the
above criteria and that it does not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
The
Certificate
16. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that, in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Athlone Travel Ltd. and Michael Stein
Travel Ltd. (CA/12/92), for the sale of the business Blackpool Holidays,
notified on 13 April 1992 under
Section 7, does not offend against
Section 4(1)
of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Patrick
Massey
Member
4
June 1992
[ ] 1 Notification
no. CA/8/91 - Nallen/O'Toole (Belmullet), decision of 2 April 1992.
[ ]2 Reuter/BASF
(76/743/EEC, OJ L254, 17.9.76, p. 40), Nutricia/deRooji and Nutricia/Zuid
Hollandse Conservenfabriek (83/670/EEC, OJ L376, 31.12.83, p.22), and
Mecaniver-PPG (85/78/EEC, OJ L35, 7.2.85, p. 54). The European Court of
Justice dealt with an appeal in the Nutricia case. See Remia BV and Others v
European Commission, Case 42/84, [1985] ECR 2545.
© 1992 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1992/3.html