BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
Superquinn/Tenants at Superquinn S.C., Lucan [1993] IECA 107 (13th October, 1993)
COMPETITION
AUTHORITY
Competition
Authority Decision of 13 October 1993 relating to a proceeding under Section 4
of the Competition Act, 1991.
Notification
No. CA/945/92 - Superquinn/Tenants at Superquinn Shopping Centre, Lucan.
Decision
No. 107
Price £0.30
£0.70 incl. postage
Notification
No. CA/945/92 - Superquinn/Tenants at Superquinn Shopping Centre, Lucan
Decision
No. 107
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Superquinn on 30 September 1992 with a request for a certificate
under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act, 1991, or in the event of refusal by
the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2)
in respect of leases between Superquinn and the tenants of shop units at
Superquinn Shopping Centre, Newcastle Rd., Lucan, Co. Dublin.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the leases of shop units at Superquinn Shopping Centre,
Lucan, Co. Dublin between Superquinn as Landlord and 14 separate tenants.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Superquinn
are involved in the business of trading as a supermarket and in property
letting. The tenants are involved in various retail activities at the shopping
centre.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
standard shopping centre lease notified related to Unit 1 and was executed on 4
February 1992 for a term of 35 years from 1 September 1991 between Superquinn
as Landlord and M&M Enterprises Ltd as tenant. The restricted user clauses
in this lease are as follows:-
(a) Under
clause 3.13 the tenant covenants
"Not
without the prior consent in writing of the Landlord.....to use or permit or
suffer or allow the Demised Unit or any part or parts thereof to be used for
any purpose other than that specified in the Fifth Schedule hereto and for no
other purpose or purposes whatsoever.............."
The
Fifth Schedule reads under the heading "User",
"As
a retail outlet for the sale of cigarettes, tobacco, newspapers, magazines,
cards, sweets, confectionery, fruit, personal stationery and small toys."
(b) Under
clause 3.44 the tenant covenants
".1 Not
to assign, underlet or part with or share the possession or occupation of any
part of the Demised Unit........under any circumstances whatsoever.
.2 Not
to assign, underlet or part with or share the possession of the whole of the
Demised Unit except to a suitable and solvent party and subject to the written
consent of the Landlord........"
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
5. Superquinn
has advised that similar requirements attach to the leases for each of the
other tenancies with the permitted user clause 3.13 restricting each tenant to
particular specified trading activities. They have also advised that the
Landlord has issued a confirmation by way of side letter to the tenant of unit
1 that it will not grant a first letting of any units at the centre with a user
permitted to Unit 1. A similar confirmation has been issued to the tenant of
Unit 9 as well as a confirmation that the Landlord will refuse consent to a
change of user to hairdressing for any tenant in phase 1 of the centre.
The
applicability of Section 4 (1)
6. The
Authority considers that Superquinn and the tenants are undertakings and that
the notified leases are agreements between undertakings. The agreements have
effect within the State.
7. The
Authority considers that the notified agreements, and their restricted and
exclusive user clauses, and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September 1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10
September 1993, pp.665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the
notified agreements between Superquinn and its tenants do not offend against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act 1991.
The
Certificate
8. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate.
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreements between Superquinn and the tenants in
relation to the lease of shop units at Superquinn Shopping Centre, Lucan, Co.
Dublin notified under
Section 7 on 30 September 1992 (notification no.
CA/945/92E), do not offend against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
13
October 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/107.html