BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
Quinnsworth/Revoclife Ltd [1993] IECA 128 (13th October, 1993)
COMPETITION
AUTHORITY
Competition
Authority Decision of 13 October 1993 relating to a proceeding under Section 4
of the Competition Act, 1991.
Notification
No CA/613/92E - Quinnsworth / Revoclife Ltd.
Decision
No: 128
Price £0.30
£0.70 incl. postage
Notification
No. CA/613/92E - Quinnsworth/Revoclife Limited
Decision
No. 128
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Quinnsworth on 30 September 1992 with a request for a certificate
under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act, 1991 or in the event of a refusal by
the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2),
in respect of a lease between Quinnsworth and Revoclife Limited.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the lease of shop unit No.3 in the shopping centre at
Sraid an Chumainn, Ballinasloe, Co. Galway, between Quinnsworth as Landlord and
Revoclife Ltd as tenant.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Quinnsworth
trades as a supermarket with outlets throughout the State. Revoclife Ltd
trades as a newsagent at unit 3 of the shopping centre.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified shopping centre lease is in draft form and is for a term of 200 years
from 1 January 1991. The restricted user clauses in the lease are as follows:
(a) Under
Clause 4.27 the tenant covenants with the landlord
"Not
to assign transfer mortgage charge or underlet hold in trust for another or
part with the possession or occupation of the Demised Unit or any part thereof
..................
BUT
SO THAT NOT WITHSTANDING
the
foregoing the Landlord shall subject to sub-clause 7.3. hereof not unreasonably
withhold its consent to an assignment transfer or underletting of the entire of
the Demised Unit .........."
(b) Under
Clause 4.28.2 the tenant covenants with the landlord
"Not
without the prior consent in writing of the Landlord .....to use or to permit
or suffer or allow the Demised Unit or any part or parts thereof to be used for
any purpose other than as set forth in Part II of the First Schedule hereto and
for no other purpose or purposes whatsoever...."
Part
II of the First Schedule under the heading Permitted User reads:
"As
a shop for a Newsagent including for the sale of confectionery and other items
normally associated with a Newsagency but specifically to exclude any items of
groceries"
In
addition there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
Assessment
- The applicability of Section 4 (1)
5. The
Authority considers that Quinnsworth and Revoclife Ltd are undertakings and
that the notified lease is an agreement between undertakings. The agreement has
effect within the State.
6. The
Authority considers that the notified agreement, and its restricted and
exclusive user clauses, and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September 1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10
September 1993 pp.665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the notified
agreement between Quinnsworth and Revoclife Ltd, does not offend against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act 1991.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate.
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Quinnsworth and Revoclife Limited, in
relation to the lease of a premises at Sraid an Chumainn, Ballinasloe, Co.
Galway, notified under
Section 7 on 30 September 1992 (notification no.
CA/613/92E), does not offend against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority.
Des
Wall
Member
13
October 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/128.html