BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
Eugenie T. Stokes/Anthony Patterson & Cassandra Collins [1993] IECA 237 (15th December, 1993)
Notification
No: CA/1096/92E - Eugenie T. Stokes/Anthony Patterson and Cassandra Collins
Decision
No. 237
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Cassandra Collins on 30 September 1992 with a request for a
certificate under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act 1991 or, in the event of
a refusal by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2), in respect of a sale agreement between Eugenie T. Stokes and
Anthony Patterson and Cassandra Collins in relation to premises at Unit 7
Celbridge Shopping Centre, Celbridge, Co. Kildare.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the agreement governing the sale, by way of sub-fee farm
grant, of the interest of the lessor in a shop unit, Unit 7, at Celbridge
Shopping Centre, Celbridge, Co. Kildare between Eugenie T. Stokes as grantor
and Anthony Patterson and Cassandra Collins as grantees.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Eugenie
T. Stokes was the landlord of Celbridge Shopping Centre. Anthony Patterson and
Cassandra Collins were proprietors of the newsagents shop at unit 7.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
Agreement notified was an indenture executed on 22 June 1988 whereby the
lessor interest in the property was sold by way of a sub-fee Farm Grant. Under
this agreement the grantees covenant to perform and observe covenants and
conditions contained in the original Fee Farm grant (dated 9 September 1983)
which related to all the property in Folio 11802F and in an indenture of lease
(dated 15 May 1986) which related to that part of Folio 11802F known as unit 7.
The restricted user clause in the agreement notified is as follows:-
"AND
THE Grantor hereby covenants with the Grantees that:-
.............................
(c) the
Grantor shall not demise to a newsagent or permit to be used for the business
of a newsagent any of the premises comprised in the Fee Farm Grant not hereby
transferred and hereby appoints the Grantees her attorneys to issue proceedings
(at their cost and expense) against third parties for the enforcement of this
covenant......
Assessment
- The applicability of Section 4 (1)
5. The
Authority considers that Eugenie T. Stokes and Anthony Patterson and Cassandra
Collins were undertakings at the time the agreement was made and that the
notified agreement is an agreement between undertakings. The agreement has
effect within the State.
6. The
Agreement for the sale of the premises predated the coming into force of the
Competition Act and the sale was completed prior to
the Act. In the Authority's
view, the prohibition in
Section 4(1) only applies to a current or continuing
contractual commitment subsequent to the coming into force of
the Act. As the
sale element was discharged prior to the commencement of
the Act that aspect of
the arrangements does not come within the scope of
Section 4(1).
7. The
sale agreement contains an exclusive user clause whereby the Landlord of the
shopping centre covenants not to allow any of the remaining units to be used
for the purpose of a newsagency. In its Notice on Shopping Centre Leases which
was published in Iris Oifigiuil on 10 September 1993 (pp.665-667) the Authority
expressed its conclusion that such restricted user clauses in shopping centre
leases do not generally offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act 1991
for the reasons stated in that notice. The Authority would also take the view
that the inclusion of similar covenants in agreements for the sale or transfer
of landlord or lessee interests in shopping centre leases would similarly not
have the effect of preventing, restricting or distorting competition in trade
in any goods or services in the State or in any part of the State. The
Authority therefore considers that the notified agreement between Eugenie T.
Stokes and Anthony Patterson and Cassandra Collins does not offend against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act 1991.
The
Certificate
8. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate.
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Eugenie T. Stokes and Anthony
Patterson and Cassandra Collins, for the sale of premises at Celbridge Shopping
Centre, Celbridge, Co. Kildare notified under
Section 7 on 30 September 1992
(notification no. CA/1096/92E), does not offend against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
15
December 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/237.html