BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
Mall Holdings Ltd/Confrere Ltd [1993] IECA 249 (15th December, 1993)
Notification
No: CA 415/92E - Mall Holdings Ltd/Confrere Ltd
Decision
No. 249
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Confrere Ltd on 30 September, l992 with a request for a certificate
under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, l99l or, in the event of a refusal
by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under Section
4(2), in respect of a lease between Mall Holdings Ltd and Confrere Ltd.
The
Facts
(a) Subject
of the notification
2. The
Notification concerns the lease of unit 24 in the Crescent Shopping Centre,
Dooradoyle, Limerick between Mall Holdings Ltd as lessor and Confrere Ltd as
lessee.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Confrere
Ltd trades as a hairdresser at unit no 24 in the Crescent Shopping Centre.
Mall Holdings Ltd is the owner and landlord of the shopping centre.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified lease was made on 20 December, l989 with Mall Holdings Ltd for a
period of 32 years from l November, l973. The restricted user clauses in the
lease are as follows:
(a) Under
clause D 12 the lessee covenants with the lessor "...not to use or suffer to be
used the demised premises or any part thereof for Banking purposes nor for the
provision of financial services nor as a Restaurant nor (without the prior
consent in writing of the Lessor) for any purpose other than as a Ladies,
Children's and Gentlemen's Hair Salon and Body Shop."
(b) Under
clause D 15 the lessee covenants with the lessor "Not to assign (other than by
way of Mortgage) or under-let or share or part with the possession of the
demised premises or any part thereof or otherwise alienate same without the
previous written consent of the Lessor such consent not to be unreasonably
withheld."
(c) Under
clause G l the lessor covenants with the lessee "...that it shall not during
the currency of the term granted by these presents without the prior consent of
Confrere Ltd demise any Unit within the Shopping Centre for use as a Hair Salon
and Body Shop."
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
Assessment
- The Applicability of Section 4(1).
5. The
Authority considers that Confrere Ltd and Mall Holdings Ltd are undertakings
and that the notified lease is an agreement between undertakings. The
agreement has effect within the State.
6. The
Authority considers that the notified agrement, and its restricted and
exclusive user clauses and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September 1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10
September 1993, pp.665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the
notified agreement between Mall Holdings Ltd and Confrere Ltd does not offend
against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, l99l.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Mall Holdings Limited and Confrere Ltd
in relation to the lease of the premises at Crescent Shopping Centre,
Dooradoyle, Limerick notified under Section 7 on 30 September 1992
(notification no. CA/415/92E), does not offend against Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, l99l.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
15
December 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/249.html