BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
Brian Moran/Universal Travel/Hewetts Travel [1993] IECA 26 (1st July, 1993)
Notification
No. CA/1081/92E - Brian Moran/Universal Travel Agency Limited/Hewetts Travel
Agency Limited
Decision
No. 26
Introduction
1. An
agreement between Brian Moran, Jean Moran, Alan Dargan, Peter Dargan and
Michael Dargan (the vendors) and Hewetts Travel Agency Limited (Hewetts)
containing a non-compete clause pursuant to the sale of the entire share
capital of Universal Travel Agency Limited (Universal) was notified to the
Competition Authority on 30 September 1992. The notification requested a
certificate or, in the event of a certificate being refused, a licence.
The
Facts
(a)
The Subject of the Notification
2. The
notification relates to an agreement dated 10 December 1990 between the vendors
and Hewetts whereby the vendors agree to sell the entire issued share capital
of Universal to Hewetts. The agreement also contains a non-compete provision.
(b) The
Parties
3. Universal
Travel Agency Limited is a limited company operating as a travel agency and
engaged in the package tour/holiday business. At the time of completion of the
agreement, Brian Moran, Jean Moran, Alan Dargan, Peter Dargan and Michael
Dargan (the vendors) were the collective beneficial owners of Universal.
Hewetts Travel Agency Limited also operates as a travel agency engaged in the
package tour/holiday business.
(c) The
Arrangements
4. The
notification relates to an agreement, dated 10 December 1990, for the sale of
the entire share capital of Universal to Hewetts. The agreement contains a
non-compete clause preventing the vendors from becoming involved in the
business of travel agents or tour operators for a period of two years from the
date of completion. This period expired on 10 December 1992.
Assessment
(a) Section
4(1)
5. Section
4(1) of the Competition Act states that 'all agreements between undertakings,
decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which have as
their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition
in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of the State are
prohibited and void'.
(b) The
Undertakings and the Agreement
6. Section
3(1) of the Competition Act defines an undertaking as ´a person being an
individual, a body corporate or an unincorporated body of persons engaged for
gain in the production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of a
service.' The parties to the present agreement are the vendors and Hewetts.
Hewetts are engaged for gain in the provision of travel agency services. The
vendors were similarly engaged for gain at the time of the agreement through
their ownership of Universal. They were undertakings at the time of the
agreement. This is consistent with the Authority's decisions in ACT/Kindle and
Scully/Tyrrell.
[1]
(c) Applicability
of Section 4(1)
7. As
the sale of business was completed prior to 1 October, 1991, the date on which
the Competition Act came into force, this element of the agreement had been
discharged by performance before the Act commenced. The property which was the
subject of the agreement had been transferred. In the Authority's view, the
prohibition in Section 4(1) only applies to a current or continuing contractual
commitment or one entered into subsequent to the coming into force of the Act
[2].
As the merger or sale element of the 1991 transaction was discharged prior to
the commencement of the Act, that aspect of the arrangements does not come
within the scope of Section 4(1).
8. The
non-compete clause has expired so there is no longer any restriction on the
vendors.
The
Decision
9. In
the Authority's opinion, Brian Moran, Jean Moran, Alan Dargan, Peter Dargan and
Michael Dargan and Hewetts Travel Agency Limited are undertakings within the
meaning of Section 3(1) of the Competition Act, and the notified arrangements
for the acquisition of the business of Universal Travel Agency Limited by
Hewetts, constitute an agreement between undertakings.
10. The
Authority believes that as the sale element of the transaction was discharged
prior to the commencement of the Competition Act, the agreement for the
purchase and sale of Universal does not come within the scope of Section 4(1)
of the Act. As the non-compete clause has expired, there is no longer any
restriction on the vendors and, consequently, the agreement does not offend
against section 4(1).
The
Certificate
11. The
Competition Authority has issued the following decision:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Brian Moran, Jean Moran, Alan Dargan,
Peter Dargan and Michael Dargan and Hewetts Travel Agency Limited for the
purchase and sale of the entire share capital of Universal Travel Agency
Limited (notification no. CA/108/92E), notified on 30 September 1992 under
Section 7 does not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Patrick
Massey
Member
1
July 1993
[ ] 1 Decision
No. 8, ACT Group plc and Kindle Group; Decision No. 12, Scully Tyrrell &
Company and Edberg Limited
[ ]2 'Notice
in respect of mergers and Takeovers which predate the Competition Act' -
Competition Authority
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/26.html