BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
UCD/Bank of Ireland [1994] IECA 288 (10th March, 1994)
Notification
No. CA/332/92E - University College Dublin/The Governor and Company of the Bank
of Ireland
Decision
No. 288
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland (Bank of Ireland)
on 30 September 1992 with a request for a certificate under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act 1991 or, in the event of a refusal by the Competition Authority
to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2), in respect of a
concession agreement between University College Dublin and the Bank of Ireland.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the notification
2.
The
notification concerns the grant by University College Dublin of a sole
concession to the Bank of Ireland to operate a bank branch on the university
campus at Belfield, Dublin 4.
(b) The
parties involved
3. The
Bank of Ireland is the second largest commercial bank in Ireland with a network
of 290 branches within the State. University College Dublin (UCD) is a
constituent college of the National University of Ireland, which was
established under the National University Act and incorporated by charter in
1908. UCD enjoys a large degree of autonomy with its own Governing body and is
primarily engaged in the provision of third level education and in research.
In addition to Government grants of £39m, UCD had an income in 1992 of
£19m from academic fees and £11.6m from other sources.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified agreement was made on 1 October, 1979 for a period of 16 years and
extended for a further 10 years from 1 March 1989 by way of supplemental
agreement dated 19 September, 1984. Under the agreement, University College
Dublin, granted a sole concession to Bank of Ireland to operate a bank branch
on the University campus in premises provided rent free by UCD. The agreement
also provides for the calculation of an annual licence fee as well as several
clauses relating to the occupation and maintenance of the premises. It also
specifically provides "...it is hereby mutually agreed that nothing herein
contained shall create the relationship of Landlord and Tenant between the
College and the Bank in respect of the said premises.".
Assessment
- The applicability of Section 4(1)
5.
Section
4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991 refers to agreements between undertakings and
Section 3(1) of
the Act defines undertaking as a "person being an individual, a
body corporate or an unincorporated body of persons engaged for gain in the
production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of a service."
According to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the VHI case, as delivered by
Finlay C.J, the words "for gain" connote merely an activity carried on or a
service supplied, as in this case, which is done in return for a charge or
payment". UCD is engaged in the provision of the services of third level
education and research for which it receives substantial revenue by way of fees
etc and it is therefore an undertaking engaged for gain in the provision of a
service. Bank of Ireland is an undertaking engaged for gain in the provision
of banking and other financial services. The notified agreement is therefore an
agreement between undertakings. The agreement has effect within the State.
6. The
agreement notified contains standard restrictions and obligations on both
parties which are necessary for the maintenance of a proper relationship in
regard to the operation of the concession and the occupation of the premises.
These do not raise issues under the
Competition Act. The agreement also
provides for exclusivity in relation to the operation by Bank of Ireland of the
banking concession. In a number of earlier decisions the Authority has already
indicated its view that exclusive user clauses in the letting of premises in a
particular shopping centre or building complex do not offend against
Section
4(1) of the
Competition Act. For similar reasons this view also applies in
relation to the grant of an exclusive concession to use premises in a building
complex for the purposes of a business. In this instance while Bank of Ireland
is the only bank situated within the university campus, Allied Irish Banks has
a branch at the gate of the campus. There are also 6 branches of competitor
banks and 2 ATM machine sites within a radius of two miles of the university
while four building societies have eleven branches within the same radius. The
Authority therefore considers that the notified agreement between University
College Dublin and the Bank of Ireland does not offend against
section 4(1) of
the
Competition Act, 1991.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate.
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between University College, Dublin and the
Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, in relation to a banking
concession at University College, Dublin, notified under
Section 7 on 30
September 1992 (notification no. CA/332/92E), does not offend against
Section 4
(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
10
March 1994
© 1994 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1994/288.html