BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
Irish Nurseries/Uniplumo (Ire) Ltd [1994] IECA 300 (24th March, 1994)
Notification
no. CA/320/92E - Irish Nurseries Limited/Negley Groom/Give Joy
Limited/Uniplumo (Ireland) Limited
Decision
No 300
Introduction
1. An
agreement between Irish Nurseries Limited and Negley Groom (the vendors), and
Uniplumo (Ireland) Limited (the purchaser) for the sale of the entire share
capital of Give Joy Limited to Uniplumo (Ireland) Limited was notified to the
Competition Authority on 30 September 1992, with a request for a certificate,
or, in the event of a refusal to issue a certificate, a licence.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the Notification
2. The
notification concerns an agreement, dated 20 February 1991, for the sale of the
entire issued share capital of Give Joy Limited to the purchaser. The agreement
contained a number of non-compete clauses.
(b) The
Parties
3. Irish
Nurseries Limited is a holding company, incorporated in the State, which
operates as a wholesale fruit merchants. A liquidator was appointed to the
company in January 1994. Give Joy Limited was, at the time of the agreement, a
subsidiary of Irish Nurseries Limited and operated as a nursery and a flower
and pot plant distributor. Negley Groom is a nurseryman and a holder of the
controlling interest in Irish Nurseries Limited. Connolly Kelly & Co
Limited is a subsidiary of Irish Nurseries, and is involved in the business of
selling fruit and plants in the Dublin fruit market. It also delivers plants,
by van to locations within the greater Dublin area and by train to locations
outside Dublin. Pot Plants Limited is also a subsidiary of Irish Nurseries
Limited and was involved in the business of growing plants in glasshouses.
Uniplumo (Ireland) Limited is a limited liability company, having its
registered office at Kenmare, Co. Kerry, and is in the business of pot plant
and cut flower distribution, mainly to multiples.
(c) The
arrangements
4. The
notification relates to an agreement made in February 1991 for the sale of the
entire share capital of Give Joy Limited to Uniplumo (Ireland) Limited. Clause
9.01 of the agreement prevented Connolly Kelly, for a period of three years
from completion of the agreement, from selling or distributing potted plants
other than by means of three vans within a twenty mile radius of Dublin, or,
other than by rail (except in the case of a rail strike) throughout the
country. They were also prevented, for the same period from soliciting any of
the multiple customers of Give Joy or the purchaser, which were not currently
serviced by Connolly Kelly or from marketing or distributing potted plants from
any location other than from the bank in Dublin fruit market or its premises in
the Corporation Fruit Market, Dublin 7. Clause 9.04 prevented the vendor, for a
period of three years from completion, from using its Kimmage premises for
growing, distributing or marketing potted plants which were not
second-quality. Pot Plants was prevented from supplying pot plants to anybody
other than Connolly Kelly or the purchaser. However, the vendor and/or its
subsidiaries were permitted to sell second quality plants to third parties
provided the sales of such plants did not exceed £50,000 p.a. The vendor
was prevented, for three years from completion, from selling its Kimmage
premises, except in the event that it would not be used for the purposes of
growing, distributing, selling or marketing plants for three years. Clause 9.06
prevented the vendor and its associated companies from soliciting any employees
of Give Joy or its associated companies for three years from completion of the
agreement.
(d) Subsequent
Developments
5. The
Authority communicated its concern regarding the non-compete clauses in a
letter to the parties, dated 15 July, 1993. However, no reply was received
from the parties concerned.
Assessment
(a) Section
4(1)
6. Section
4(1) of the Competition Act states that "all agreements between undertakings,
decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices, which have
as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of
competition in goods or services in the State or in any part of the State are
prohibited and void"
(b) The
Undertakings and the Agreement
7. Section
3(1) of the Competition Act defines an undertaking as "a person, being an
individual, a body corporate or an unincorporated body engaged for gain in the
production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of a service."
Irish Nurseries Limited was a corporate body engaged for gain. At the time of
the agreement Irish Nurseries and Negley Groom were the beneficial owners of
Give Joy which operated as a nursery, engaged for gain in flower and pot plant
distribution. Uniplumo (Ireland) Limited is a corporate body which is also
engaged for gain in the business of pot plant and cut flower distribution.
Therefore, they were undertakings. Consequently the notified arrangements
constituted an agreement between undertakings.
(c)
Applicability of Section 4(1)
8. As
the sale of business agreement was completed prior to 1 October, 1991, the date
on which the Competition Act came into force, this element of the agreement had
been discharged by performance before the Act commenced. In the Authority's
view, the prohibition under Section 4(1) only applies to a current or
continuing contractual commitment, or one entered into subsequent to the coming
into force of the Act
[1].
The sale element of the agreement was discharged and the property which was
the subject of the agreement had been transferred prior to commencement of the
Act, consequently, that aspect of the arrangements does not come within the
scope of section 4(1).
9. Clause
9.01 provided that Connolly Kelly could not, for a period of three years from
completion, distribute or sell potted plants other than by means of three vans
within a twenty mile radius of Dublin or, other than by train throughout the
country. They were also prevented, for the same period, from marketing or
distributing potted plants from any location other than its premises in
Corporation Fruit market, Dublin 7. Similarly, in clause 9.04 the vendor was
prevented, for a period of three years, from using its Kimmage premises for
growing, distributing or marketing potted plants which were not second-quality.
Pot Plants was prevented from supplying anybody other than Connolly Kelly or
the purchaser. The Authority has given its view on non-compete clauses in the
sale of business agreements in a number of cases. In Nallen/O' Toole the
Authority stated that "such a clause is essential in the sale of a business
for the transfer of the goodwill of the business to the purchaser"
[2].
In general the Authority considers that a period of two years is adequate for
such purposes. This view was expressed by the Authority in General
Semiconductor and has been reiterated on a number of occasions subsequently
[3].
Connolly Kelly were not absolutely prevented from competing as they could use
a small number of vans to distribute plants in Dublin and could also sell
nationwide provided they shipped plants by train. In addition they could still
operate from the premises in the corporation fruit market in Dublin 7. Pot
Plants could still supply plants to Connolly Kelly or the purchaser. In the
Authority's opinion the period of three years did not offend against Section
4(1) because the restriction on the vendor competing was not absolute. In
addition as Irish Nurseries went into liquidation before the three years
expired, the question of restricting competition no longer arises. Similarly,
the restriction for three years on soliciting the multiple customers of Give
Joy or of the purchaser and on soliciting employees of the company or its
subsidiaries did not have the effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting
competition since the vendors and Connolly Kelly were able to compete in the
market and therefore, did not offend against Section 4(1).
10. The
restriction on the vendor selling the Kimmage premises, except for use other
than as a business involving the growing, sale, distribution or marketing of
potted plants does not, in the Authority's opinion, offend against section
4(1). In Fuel Distributors/Enright, a similar restriction prevented Mr Enright
using the premises he had bought for the purposes of a solid fuel business
[4].
The Authority stated that if Mr Enright wished to become involved in the solid
fuel business, he could do so in any other premises in the vicinity or
elsewhere in the State. Similarly, in the Authority's opinion the restriction
did not prevent any other person engaging in the solid fuel business in any
part of the state. The Authority believes that the restriction on selling the
premises in this particular agreement is similar to that in the case of Fuel
Distributors/Enright and therefore it does not offend against section 4(1).
The
Decision
11. In
the Competition Authority's opinion, the agreement between Irish Nurseries
Limited, Negley Groom, Give Joy Limited and Uniplumo Ireland Limited for the
sale of the entire share capital of Give Joy Limited to Uniplumo (Ireland)
Limited (notification no. CA/320/92E) notified on 30 September 1992, under
Section 7(2), constitutes an agreement between undertakings. In the
Authority's opinion, the restriction on Connolly Kelly competing with the
company and soliciting customers and the restriction on the vendor competing,
solicitng employees and selling its Kimmage premises in clause 9 of the
arrangements, as notified, did not have, as their object or effect, the
prevention, restriction or distortion of competition and did not offend against
Section 4(1) during the period in which they operated.
The
Certificate
12. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement dated 20 February 1991, between Irish
Nurseries Limited, Negley Groom and Uniplumo (Ireland) Limited for the sale of
the entire share capital of Give Joy Limited to Uniplumo (Ireland) Limited
(notification no. CA/320/92E), notified to the Competition Authority on 30
September 1992, under Section 7, did not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991, during the period in which it operated.
Patrick
Massey
Member
24
March 1994.
[ ] 1 Notice
in respect of Mergers and Takeovers which predate the Competition Act' -
Competition Authority, Iris Oifigiuil, May 1993, p.367
[ ]2 Competition
Authority Decision No. 1, Nallen/O Toole (Belmullet), CA/8/91, 2 April 1992.
[ ]3 Competition
Authority Decision No. 10, GI Corporation/ General Semiconductor Industries
Inc., CA/51/92 and CA/52/92, 23 October 1992.
[ ]4 Competition
Authority decision no. 145, notification no. CA/61/93, Fuel Distributors Ltd/J
Enright, 18 November 1993.
© 1994 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1994/300.html