BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
Maxol/Distributor (Licence) Licence (Deed of Change) [1994] IECA 320 (21st April, 1994)
Notification
Nos.
(a) CA/95/92E
- Maxol/Distributor Agreement (Licence)
(b) CA/96/92
- Maxol/Distributor Agreement (Deed of Charge)
Decision
No.320
Introduction
1. Notification
was made of 2 agreements by Maxol Limited on 17 September 1992 with a request
for a licence under
Section 4(2) of the
Competition Act, 1991 in respect of its
Licence Agreement and its Deed of Charge Agreement with distributors.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the notification
2. The
decision concerns two types of documents signed by Maxol and some of its
exclusive distributors namely a Licence Agreement and a Deed of Charge Agreement.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Maxol
Limited is a limited company which supplies petroleum products. The other
parties to the arrangements are the company's distributors of the petroleum
products.
(c) The
products and the market
4. The
products involved are fuel oil products. The oil companies involved in this
market generally use distributors to deliver to final customers and do not use
their own staff as in the past.
(d) The
notified agreements
5. Maxol
notified its exclusive distribution agreement for fuel oils (CA/91/92E) and the
Authority considered that the agreement, as amended, satisfied the conditions
of the category licence for exclusive distribution agreements (decision no. 144
of 5 November 1993). Maxol also notified two other agreements which are
associated with the exclusive distribution agreement, which are the subject of
this decision.
(a) Maxol
Licence Agreement for Authorised Distributors
This
agreement is used where Maxol owns a distribution depot and licences it to a
distributor for 2 years and 9 months. There are said to be 10 such licences in
existence. Maxol is entitled to share the use of the premises. Maxol agrees to
hire to the licensee specified equipment and articles, and the licensee agrees
to pay Maxol a stated sum for the use of the depot and the hire of the
equipment. The licensee agrees to use the depot solely for the purpose of
storage and distribution of Maxol petroleum products, and not, without consent,
to use the depot for any other purpose, and to leave on the equipment
identification signs placed by Maxol. The licensee is required to insure the
depot and Maxol's fixtures and fittings, and to keep proper books and accounts,
and allow these to be inspected by Maxol. The licence may not be transferred,
and the agreement does not establish any partnership or joint venture between
Maxol and the licensee.
(b) Maxol
Deed of Charge (Distributors)
This
agreement is used for security where Maxol provides a loan for an authorised
distributor. There were said to be eight such agreements in existence. The
agreement is not in standard form. One particular deed of charge was notified,
with Mr. John Kennedy (the dealer) and Mohill Fuel Oils Ltd, Finiskil, Mohill,
Co. Leitrim (the borrower), and this decision is confined to that agreement.
The agreement is dated 17 December 1991. The dealer and the borrower agree to
repay the loan, and the dealer conveys the premises in favour of Maxol, subject
to the provision for redemption. The borrower agrees to maintain an adequate
staff for the sale of Maxol products, and to purchase motor fuels and other oil
based products exclusively from Maxol for five years, and not to buy or sell
such products on the premises or any adjoining premises of the borrower unless
they have been purchased from Maxol. The borrower also agrees to purchase
minimum annual quantities of motor spirit and to accept minimum deliveries.
(e) Submissions
by Maxol
6. In
support of its application for a licence, Maxol stated that the licence enabled
Maxol to offer rentals at terms well below the appropriate commercial rates for
such facilities. It also justified the expenditure involved in developing the
site and its facilities. In respect of the deed of charge, Maxol stated that,
without such sureties, the advancement of loan facilities could not be
commercially justified.
Assessment
Applicability
of Section 4(1)
7.
Section
4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991 prohibits and renders void all agreements
between undertakings which have as their object or effect the prevention,
restriction or distortion of competition in trade in any goods or services in
the State or in any part of the State.
The
Undertakings
8.
Section
3(1) of the
Competition Act defines an undertaking as "a person being an
individual, a body corporate or an unincorporated body of persons engaged for
gain in the production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of a
service." Maxol Limited and the distributors are engaged in the sale of
petroleum oil products for gain, and are therefore undertakings within the
meaning of
Section 3(1) of the
Competition Act.
The
Agreements
9. All
the notified agreements are connected with, and dependent upon, the exclusive
distribution agreements, they form part of the exclusive distribution
arrangements and, in some cases, they strengthen those arrangements. In the
opinion of the Authority, while the agreements might contain some provisions
which by themselves could offend against
Section 4(1), all the notified
agreements offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act because they
underpin an exclusive distribution agreement which itself offends against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act for the reasons given in the category
licence for exclusive distribution agreements.
Applicability
of Section 4(2)
10. Under
Section 4(2), the Competition Authority may grant a licence in the case of any
agreement or category of agreements which, "having regard to all relevant
market conditions, contributes to improving the production or distribution of
goods or provision of services or to promoting technical or economic progress,
while allowing consumers a fair share of the resulting benefit and which does
not-
(i) impose
on the undertakings concerned terms which are not indispensable to the
attainment of those objectives;
(ii) afford
undertakings the possibility of eliminating competition in respect of a
substantial part of the products or services in question."
11.
The Authority has decided that the basic Maxol standard exclusive distribution
agreement satisfies the conditions of the category licence. It is of the
opinion that the notified related agreements also satisfy the conditions of the
category licence, for the same reasons, and thus they also satisfy the
requirements of
Section 4(2) of the
Competition Act. This applies also to any
exclusivity provisions specifically included in the notified agreements. A
licence may therefore be issued in relation to each of these agreements. The
licences come into effect on 21 April 1994. They will expire on the date of
expiry of the category licence for exclusive distribution agreements, that is
on 31 December 1998.
The
Decision
12. In
the Authority's opinion, Maxol and the other parties to the agreements are
undertakings . The notified agreements between the parties are agreements
between undertakings. The Authority considers that the notified agreements
offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991. The Authority
considers that the notified agreements satisfy the conditions of
Section 4(2)
of the
Competition Act. It has therefore decided to issue a licence to each of
the notified agreements, and these licences shall apply from 21 April 1994 to
31 December 1998. It is not considered necessary to attach any conditions to
the licences.
The
Licences
13. The
Competition Authority has issued the following licences:
The
provisions of
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991 are declared
inapplicable to the following agreements notified to the Competition Authority
by Maxol Limited on 17 September 1992, on the grounds that, in the opinion of
the Authority, all the conditions of
Section 4(2) of the
Competition Act, 1991
have been fulfilled:
(a) Maxol
Limited/Distributor Licence Agreement - CA/95/92E
(b) Maxol
Limited/John Kennedy/Mohill Fuel Oils Ltd (Deed of Charge) -CA/96/92
These
licences shall apply from 21 April 1994 to 31 December 1998.
For
the Competition Authority
Patrick
M. Lyons
Chairman.
21
April 1994
© 1994 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1994/320.html