BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
G. & M. Paul/R. Lyne [1994] IECA 360 (12th October, 1994)
COMPETITION
AUTHORITY
Notification
No. CA/20/94 - George and Margaret Paul/Riobard Lyne
Decision
No. 360
Price: £0.40
£0.80 incl. postage
Competition
Authority Decision No. 360 of 12 October 1994 relating to a proceeding under
Section 4 of the Competition Act, 1991.
Notification
No. CA/20/94 - George and Margaret Paul/Riobard Lyne
Decision
No. 360
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Riobard Lyne on 22 July 1994 with a request for a certificate under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act, 1991 or, in the event of a refusal by the
Competition Authority to grant a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2) in
respect of a contract for sale relating to Beaufort Townhouse, 25 Pembroke
Park, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4.
The
Facts
(a) Subject
of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the contract for sale agreement relating to Beaufort
Townhouse, which is operated as a guest house, between George and Margaret Paul
as vendor and Riobard Lyne as purchaser.
(b) The
parties involved
3. George
and Margaret Paul carried on the business of a guest house at Beaufort
Townhouse up to the date it was sold to Riobard Lyne. Riobard Lyne is now the
owner and operator of Beaufort Townhouse.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified contract was signed on 30 May 1994 and provides for the purchase price
for the premises and its contents with the closing date set as 3 June 1994.
The special conditions to the sale, which were also notified, relate largely to
the transfer of title and the position regarding charges on the property but
also include the following clause viz.
"The
Vendors agree that the Property has been sold as a going concern and the
Vendors covenant with the Purchaser not within a period of two years from the
date hereof and within a radius of 3 miles from Beaufort Town House to:-
1. Contact,
approach or solicit any Client of Beaufort Town House in relation to the
provision of short term overnight accommodation.
2. Individually
or jointly, as Partners or Shareholders in any Company purchase or acquire any
interest in a Guest House, Hostel or Hotel provided always it is hereby
acknowledged by the Purchaser that the Vendors own, Lease and or operate and
will continue to own and or operate various Flats, Digs, Bedsits and other
Properties (which do and shall not for the said period of 2 years within the
said radius consist of a Guesthouse, Hotel, Hostel or Motel) and are not
prevented under this clause from acquiring, Leasing, Purchasing any further of
such Properties and or operating same.
3. Subject
to the above Margaret Paul agrees that she shall not as Employee, Proprietor,
Partner or Shareholder become engaged on a full time basis in the provision of
Guest House, Hostel or Hotel accommodation provided always it is hereby
acknowledged and agreed with the Purchaser that she may work for temporary
periods not exceeding a total of six weeks in any 12 month period as an
employee only in a Guest House or otherwise in providing relief work and may
work in a Hotel in the restaurant area on the basis that the remaining clause
hereof remain in force."
5. In
their submission the Solicitors for Riobard Lyne stated that the nature of the
services provided was overnight short-term guest house accommodation. The
business was in the nature of a small hotel. It was not a specific market
otherwise in the sense that customers would be drawn from business and the
private sector and all manner of persons would stay in the premises both Irish
nationals and tourists. They also stated that the arrangement consisted
primarily of a private agreement between individuals which had as its intention
and objective the protection of the investment of the purchaser. It would not
in any way restrict or distort competition in general in the Guest House/Hotel
industry given that this particular premises/business would only represent a
tiny fraction of the total available overnight accommodation in the area.
Assessment
- The Applicability of Section 4(1)
6. The
Authority considers that George and Margaret Paul and Riobard Lyne, as guest
house owners, are undertakings and that the notified contract is an agreement
between undertakings. The agreement has effect within the State.
7. Under
the contract for sale agreement, the ownership of a guest house and the guest
house business at the premises passes from George and Margaret Paul to Riobard
Lyne. The sale of a business does not
per
se
offend against
Section 4(1).
8. In
addition the special conditions to the contract contain a number of non compete
clauses which prevent the former owners of the business for a period of 2 years
from the date of sale not to solicit any client of the guest house in relation
to the provision of short term overnight accommodation or become involved in
the hotel, hostel or guest house business. The restriction is confined to the
area within 3 miles of the premises sold.
9. The
Authority has dealt with restrictions on the vendor following the sale of a
business on a number of occasions. In its first decision, Nallen/O'Toole
[1],
the Authority stated that it regarded some restrictions on the seller of a
business as being essential in order to ensure the adequate transfer of the
goodwill of the business. In its opinion, provided such restrictions were
limited in terms of their duration, geographic coverage and subject matter to
what was necessary to secure the transfer of the goodwill of the business, they
would not be in breach of
Section 4(1) of
the Act. In GI Corporation/General
Semiconductor Industries Inc.
[2]
the Authority considered that a restriction of 2 years would generally be
regarded as sufficient for the complete transfer of the goodwill of a business.
In this instance the time restriction applies for 2 years which is within the
criteria accepted by the Competition Authority. Similarly, the application of
the restriction to an area within 3 miles of the premises sold is no more than
is necessary to protect the goodwill of the business being sold. The Authority
therefore considers that these restrictive clauses do not offend against
Section 4(1) and that the notified agreement between George and Margaret Paul
and Riobard Lyne does not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act,
1991. It is not clear to the Authority why it was felt necessary to obtain a
certificate for this agreement in the first place.
The
Certificate
10. The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between George and Margaret Paul and Riobard
Lyne in relation to the contract for sale of Beaufort Townhouse, 25 Pembroke
Park, Dublin 4 notified under
Section 7 on 22 July 1994 (Notification No.
CA/20/94), does not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
12
October 1994
[ ] 1 Competition
Authority Decision No. 1, 2nd April, 1992.
[ ]2 Competition
Authority Decision No. 10, 23 October, 1992.
© 1994 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1994/360.html