BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
High Court of Ireland Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> High Court of Ireland Decisions >> Brannigan v. Minister for Finance [2001] IEHC 160 (12th November, 2001) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/2001/160.html Cite as: [2001] IEHC 160 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
1. The
applicant is now a retired Garda Síochána having served in the
Gardaí for thirty years. Unfortunately in the month in which he retired
he was assaulted while helping to escort a prisoner to his cell in Cork
District Court. He was beaten on the shin with handcuffs that were taken from
another garda and used to flail the applicant on the left shin. In the scuffle
- he does not know exactly how - his right foot was injured and he suffered a
fracture to the second right toe. This required a splint and he was out of
work for one month from the date of the incident on the 3rd of October 1995 to
the 1st of November 1995.
2. Sometime
later - perhaps months - his daughter, a surgical registrar, noted from his
gait that he had difficulty walking and referred him to Mr James Coville, who,
in turn, found impaired dorsiflexion or ankle drop which he suspected had been
caused by an injury to a nerve in the back. More particularly was diagnosed as
a nerve compression of the L5 root due to fibrous tissue and residual disc
herniation. This was causing weakness in the muscle group, and inability to
dorsiflex together with some loss of sensation of the anterior aspect of his
foot. It was a permanent disability and would not improve with surgery.
3. He
was subsequently seen by Mr James Coville on the 6th of June 1996. Mr Coville
noted that the applicant had back trouble at one stage and that a problem with
his right knee which required a medial meniscectomy. He was found to have a
fracture of the proximal interphalangal joint of the second toe, involving the
articular surface. He was treated conservatively. Mr Coville noted the
applicant’s complaint that his right foot was numb, that he had poor
control over his foot but didn’t have any pain and his sleep was
undisturbed. A nerve conduction study and EMG was arranged and showed evidence
of damage to the right L4-5/S1 nerve roots. The damage apparently was proximal
to the intervention of the biceps femoris muscle. This would be in keeping
with the patient having previous degenerative disc disease and requiring
treatment.
5. Mr
Byrne saw the applicant on the 4th of October 1996 over one year after the
incident. He found that he had a very significant dropped foot, weakness in
his right leg, all associated with L5 nerve root compression. His MRI scan
confirmed a prolapsed inter vertebral disc at that level. He had surgery on
the 31st of October 1996 his L5 nerve root was compressed significantly with
fibrous tissue and residual disc herniation. His S1 nerve root was normal.
The L5 nerve root was decompressed and a partial disectomy was performed. By
December 1996 his leg power improved somewhat but there was still significant
weakness in his leg and he had weakness of aversion of his foot. When he was
seen again in June 1997 he had no back or leg pain but still had a significant
weakness despite surgery in the muscle groups of the anterior compartment of
his right leg. This causes him to trip and drag his foot. He has also some
loss and sensation over the anterior aspect of his foot which is permanent and
unlikely to change.
7. Mr
Coville’s second report of the 15th of October 1999, four years after the
incident he complained that he had problems with the second toe which catches
on things and causes some pain. He also has problems with at lot of cramps in
his leg and he states his right leg is wasted. The sensation in the back of
his foot and right ankle remains altered.
8. On
examination the only change, if any, was some more wasting of the calf muscles
below the knee. Mr Coville was of the opinion that the patient’s
situation remained unchanged as far as his foot is concerned. He has a still
second toe which gets in the way when he is doing certain activities. However
the more significant problem is that in the lumbar spine.
9. Mr
Byrne’s final report of the 20th of August 1999 made to the
applicant’s solicitors stated that he could not say definitely when the
applicant sustained a prolapsed disc that caused his right leg drop foot. The
report states:-
10. The
applicant stated in evidence that, during the thirty years of service, he had
never made an application under the Garda Compensation Act. This was despite
having been beaten up at a soccer match some ten years ago and having some back
problems fourteen years ago occasioned by a fall in a mini bus where he was
struck in the back with the edge of the tubular steel side seating which
resulted in sick leave for eight weeks.
11. The
applicant says he did not complain to Dr Coville about his back. Mr Byrne
noted no back or leg pain in June 1997 (see report dated the 25th of November
1998). The applicant, in his evidence, says that he had no problem with the
back but was in constant discomfort with his ankle and leg due to numbness.
12. The
Garda Surgeon who saw the applicant on the 27th of November 2000 noted that the
applicant was a highly motivated man and had adjusted to his situation. He
noted the obvious wasting of the muscles of the anterior leg and the loss of
sensation. The applicant walks in a slightly awkward fashion but has adjusted
well to his situation.
14. The
applicant has made light of his injuries. The original injuries, to the left
shin, are clearly unrelated to the injury to the right toe which were fractured
and required a splint. The loss of sensation in the dorsal aspect of his right
foot with resultant weakness of dorsiflexion of his right foot would seem to
have resulted from the compression of the L5 nerve root, resulting in permanent
nerve damage. Despite the partial disectomy there remains a significant
weakness in his leg. While Mr Byrne cannot say definitely when the applicant
sustained the prolapsed disc that caused his right drop foot he says it is
possible that it occurred at the time of the accident in question.
15. Mr
Byrne does not refer to any previous back injury. His opinion in the report of
the 25th of November 1998 refers to the applicant injuring his back and
sustaining a prolapsed disc which compressed the L5 nerve root which caused the
weakness in his right leg and the loss of sensation over the anterior aspect of
his foot.
16. The
Court has to consider the following two factors, that of causation and of pain
and suffering.
17. The
injury to the foot did not cause the compression of the nerve in the disc.
That was caused by an injury to the back which could have occurred in a
previous incidence and could have been exacerbated by the incident in Cork
District Court cell. Mr Byrne states that it is possible that it occurred at
the time of that incident.
18. I
was impressed with the evidence given by the applicant. He has problems with
his second right hand toe. He has problems with cramps and wasting of his
right leg muscles. He does not complain of pain in his back and is careful not
to put himself into a position where he could have problems.
19. It
seems to me that his resilient personality and, indeed, his employment since he
retired have stood to him.
20. Any
award has to take into account the above two factors and, of course, the fact
that the applicant is left with a permanent disability which will not improve
with further surgery. Causation remains only at the level of possibility and
for this reason the Court assesses damages in the sum of £25,000.