BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Irish Law Reform Commission Papers and Reports |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Irish Law Reform Commission Papers and Reports >> Judgment Mortgages, Consultation Paper on (LRC CP 30-2004) [2004] IELRC CP30(3) (March 2004) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/other/IELRC/2004/CP30(3).html Cite as: [2004] IELRC CP30(3) |
[New search] [Help]
START OF PAGE 31
CHAPTER 3 THE LEGAL POSITION IN SELECTED
JURISDICTIONS
another, in other common law jurisdictions. It is instructive to
consider briefly the position in some of those other jurisdictions.
A England and Wales
judgment creditor obtaining a decree from the High Court or County
Court to apply to court for a charging order for the purpose of
enforcing judgment. The court has discretion as to whether or not to
make a charging order. If the order is made, it imposes on specified
property of the judgment debtor a charge for securing the payment of
any money due under the judgment. The charge covers any interest
of the judgment debtor under a trust, land held on bare trust for the
judgment debtor, and land held by two or more judgment debtors who
together are entitled to the whole unencumbered beneficial interest
under a trust.
enforceable "in the same manner as an equitable charge created by the
debtor by writing under his hand".[1] Accordingly, the judgment
creditor is entitled to invoke legal process for the purpose of realising
his or her security together with appropriate interest and the costs of
enforcing the charging order. The judgment creditor can apply to
court for an order for sale, or for the appointment of a receiver.
a mortgage against the jointly owned interest of the judgment debtor.
In such circumstances only a caution may be registered in the case of
registered land. With regard to unregistered land, no registration
against jointly owned interests is possible. Accordingly, a judgment
START OF PAGE 32
creditor in such circumstances will lose priority to a later mortgagee
of the legal interest.[2]
discretion as to whether or not to make a charging order.
Furthermore, it has the discretion as to whether an existing order
should be varied or rescinded, and as to whether an order for
immediate sale should be made. The court must consider all the
circumstances of the case, the personal circumstances of the debtor,
and whether any other creditor would be unduly prejudiced by the
making of the order. Where the charging order is over the family
home, there is no "presumption one way or the other"[3] as to whether
the court will make an order.
B Northern Ireland
charging order is governed in Northern Ireland by the Judgments
Enforcement (Northern Ireland) Order 1981.[4] That order establishes
the Enforcement of Judgments Office ('the Office').[5] A judgment
creditor whose judgment remains unsatisfied may apply to the Office
upon payment of a fee for the enforcement of a judgment. The Office
may impose on any land of the judgment debtor as may be specified
in the order, a charge for securing the payment of the amount
recoverable on foot of the judgment. An order may be expressed as
absolute, or subject to conditions as to notification of the judgment
debtor or otherwise. Article 46(3) provides that the order does not
take effect until it is registered in the Land Registry (in the case of
registered land) or the Registry of Deeds (in the case of unregistered
land).
12 years has expired from the date of judgment.[6]
START OF PAGE 33
the estate of registered land of which the judgment debtor is not the
registered owner may not be made: instead a caution may be
registered against the judgment debtor's interest.
charging order has the same effect on the land as a charge created by
the debtor in favour of the creditor. The exceptions are as follows:
(a) the order does not take effect until registered;[7]
(b) the order expires 12 years after judgment;[8]
(c) an order charging the estate of registered land may not be
registered;[9]
(d) subject to the terms of the order, the judgment creditor has
all the powers of sale of a mortgagee under a mortgage by
deed pursuant to the Conveyancing Acts 1881 to 1911.
vacant possession of premises, and remove goods to a place of safety.
However, where the premises are used as a dwelling, it must give not
less than seven days notice to the local Health and Social Services
Board.
C Canada – British Columbia
land in British Columbia is contained in sections 33 to 63 of the
Execution Act 1969.[10] If a plaintiff obtains judgment from a court in
the province he or she may obtain a certificate of such judgment from
the court and tender it for registration in the appropriate Land
Registry office.
name of the debtor was entered in an index known as the register of
judgments. This register was referable to the name of the defendant.
START OF PAGE 34
It was not referable to the folio numbers of land held by the
defendant. Notation was also made on any certificate of title held by
the defendant. Registration was effective for two years and was
renewable.
type of system. First, the judgment creditor need not find out if the
judgment debtor actually owns an interest in land. The judgment
creditor could simply register the judgment and if the judgment
debtor happens to own land the registration would catch that land.
Secondly, such a system was capable of affecting not only interests in
land as at the date of registration, but also interest in land acquired by
the judgment debtor after registration.
Execution Amendment Act 1978.[11] The amendment Act provided for
registration of the judgment directly against the title of property
owned by the judgment debtor in the same manner as any other
charge. The effect of this was therefore to eliminate the indices of
judgments in the various land registry offices.
situation under Irish law where the judgment creditor must identify
the specific property in which the judgment debtor has an interest
before registration can occur. Under the scheme in British Columbia
the judgment creditor could register against the judgment debtor on
the speculative possibility that the judgment debtor owned an interest
in land.
registration would not affect interests in land acquired by the
judgment debtor after registration.
pertained in England and Wales until amendment was effected
requiring the judgment creditor to identify the lands which were to be
affected by the charge.
judgment debtor in the district covered by the relevant Land Registry
office. The procedure to enforce the charge is initiated by the
START OF PAGE 35
judgment creditor applying to the Supreme Court calling on the
debtor and any other person having the legal estate in the land to
show cause why the land should not be sold to realise the amount of
the judgment debt.
execute a conveyance in the prescribed form. Registration of that
conveyance to a third party vests the judgment debtor's interest in the
purchaser free of the judgment proceeded on and of any subsequent
charges. A purchaser is not bound to inquire whether the
requirements of the Act have been met and the purchaser's rights are
not affected by any breach, impropriety or irregularity in the sale to
which he or she is not a party, even if the purchaser has notice
thereof.
issued a report on execution of judgments against land in 1978.[12] It
did not consider the question of whether exemptions should be
granted for certain types of property (eg family homes or
'homesteads').
parties – such as a joint tenant of the judgment debtor. Under British
Columbia law registration of judgment against the judgment debtor's
interest in land does not effect a severance of the joint tenancy.
Accordingly, if the judgment debtor predeceases the other joint
tenant, the judgment mortgage will be defeated. This aspect of
British Columbia law received criticism from eminent sources –
including a former Chief Justice of the British Columbia Supreme
Court.[13]
the judgment should continue not to effect a severance of the joint
tenancy. Instead, the registration should attach to the interest of the
surviving joint tenant. To temper the potential injustice to the
surviving joint tenant, the BCLRC proposed a complex form of
statutory 'marshalling' so as to limit the judgment creditor's claim.
START OF PAGE 36
that a judgment creditor who registered judgment should have
standing to bring proceedings for partition and sale of the property.
Furthermore, this should be done in the context of execution
proceedings under the Execution Act rather than under separate
partition proceedings.
to register execution against land before judgment is obtained. The
BCLRC was in favour of such a proposal: however this 'useful
innovation' should be subject to certain safeguards:
(a) the application to register should be made to court and on
notice to the defendant;
(b) the order should not be granted unless the court is satisfied
that the defendant is 'insecure' in the sense that judgment
might not otherwise be satisfied if the order were not to be
made;
(c) a balance of convenience test should be applied;
(d) the order should only be granted to a plaintiff who has
verified under oath that there is no reasonable defence to the
claim and that the plaintiff's action has a reasonable chance
of success;
(e) if the defendant is successful he or she should be granted
any damages occasioned by the pre-judgment charge.
discussed in Chapter 4 below.
D New Zealand
under the High Court rules dealing with charging orders and writs for
sale. Under these provisions a judgment creditor can obtain a
charging order the effect of which is to freeze the dealings with the
land. The judgment creditor loses any security if the judgment debtor
becomes bankrupt while the charging order is in place. Sale is
effected by writ of sale.
plaintiff may only obtain a charging order before judgment upon
proof that the defendant is making away with his or her property, or is
START OF PAGE 37
absent from or about to quit the jurisdiction, with intent to defeat the
interests of his or her creditors or the plaintiff.
issued without leave, at the request of the judgment creditor. Under
rule 570 any person claiming to be prejudicially affected by a
charging order may apply to court to have the order varied or
rescinded, or to have the registration thereof cancelled or modified.
Any person appearing to have a charge, lien or other claim on the
land, may be summoned to appear, and is entitled to be heard in any
application concerning the land.
first instance. The charging order is then registered against the
certificate of title to the land. The charging order must either:
(a) contain a description of the land affected sufficient to
identify it; or
(b) refer to a certificate of title or other instrument containing
such a description; or
(c) contain a plan showing its extent, boundaries and relative
position (unless the land is the whole of the land comprised
in a certificate or certificates of title, or is shown separately
on a plan deposited under the transfer of registered land
legislation – the Land Transfer Act 1952).
is not registered under the Land Transfer Act 1952, it must be
registered in the appropriate registry of deeds. A charging order in
respect of such land must contain:
(a) a description of the land affected sufficient to identify the
land; and
(b) a plan of the land showing its extent, boundaries and relative
position.
of the land or any part thereof under a writ of sale has any effect
against a purchaser for valuable consideration, notwithstanding that
the writ of sale may have actually been delivered for execution at the
time of purchase, and that the purchaser may have had actual or
constructive notice of the delivery of the writ of sale for execution.
START OF PAGE 38
or assignment consequent on a writ of sale of the land is registered
within two years after the date of the charging order, the charging
order ceases to bind the land and is deemed to be discharged.
However, the court has the power to extend the period during which
the charging order shall bind the land.
Note 1 Section 3(4) of theCharging Orders Act 1979. [Back] Note 2 Perry v Phoenix Assurance plc [1988] 1 WLR 940. [Back] Note 3 Harman v Glencross [1985] Fam 49, 57B. [Back] Note 4 SI 1981/226 (NI 6). [Back] Note 5 See An End Based On Means (Free Legal Advice Centre 2003) at 79. [Back] Note 6 See Article 47 of theJudgments Enforcement (Northern Ireland) Order 1981. [Back] Note 7 See Article 46(3) of theJudgments Enforcement (Northern Ireland) Order 1981. [Back] Note 8 Article 47 of the Judgments Enforcement (Northern Ireland) Order 1981. [Back] Note 9 Article 48 of the Judgments Enforcement (Northern Ireland) Order 1981. [Back] Note 10 RSBC 1969 c 135. [Back] Note 11 1978 British Columbia Bill No 32 proclaimed effective and coming into force in July 1981. [Back] Note 12 Law Reform Commission of British Columbia Report on Execution against Land (LRC 40) 1978. [Back]