BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Kerr v North Down & Ards Institute of Further & Higher Education & Ors [2002] NIIT 674_02 (04 September 2002) URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2002/674_02.html |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS
CASE REF: 674/02
APPLICANT: Mrs Margaretta Kerr
RESPONDENT: | 1. | North Down & Ards Institute of Further & Higher Education |
2. | Castlereagh College | |
3. | South Eastern Education & Library Board | |
4. | Department of Education |
ORDER
The complaint that the Applicant has been excluded from membership of her employer's pension scheme because she was a part-time worker, is struck out.
REASONS
The Application presented a complaint on 12 March 2002 that she had been excluded from membership of her employer's pension scheme by reason of her status as a part-time worker.
The date on which her employment with that employer came to an end was in or around June 1999 which was more than six months prior to the commencement of these proceedings.
The time limit for bringing such a complaint is six months from the ending of the employment relationship in question, and there is no provision for extending that limit in any circumstances.
Accordingly, by letter dated 1 July 2002, the applicant was invited to show cause why her complaint should not be struck out under rule 13(2)(d) of the Industrial Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1996, on the grounds that, as it must evitably fail, it would be frivolous or vexations to pursue it.
The Applicant has failed to show cause why the complaint should not be struck out, and I therefore Order that it be struck out under rule 13(2)(d).
VICE PRESIDENT