BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Climie v Connect Engineering Attachments Ltd [2007] NIIT 481_07 (9 August 2007) URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2007/481_07.html Cite as: [2007] NIIT 481_7, [2007] NIIT 481_07 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
CASE REF: 481/07
CLAIMANT: James Climie
RESPONDENT: Connect Engineering Attachments Ltd
The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the tribunal finds the claimant's claims well-founded and the tribunal Orders the respondent to pay to the claimant the sum of £2,936.30 in respect of redundancy pay, pay in lieu of notice and wages due and owing to the claimant upon termination of employment.
Constitution of Tribunal:
Chairman: J V Leonard
Members: 1. Mr J Currie
2. Mr B Heaney
Appearances:
There was no appearance by or on behalf of the claimant.
There was no appearance by or on behalf of the respondent.
REASONS
THE TRIBUNAL'S DETERMINATIONS OF FACT
(a) The claimant commenced employment with the respondent company on or about 6 April 2002. That employment ended with the dismissal of the claimant on or about 31 January 2007. The claimant was employed as a welder. At the date of termination of the employment the claimant had 4 years' service.
(b) The claimant's gross weekly wage was £390 and his net weekly wage was £275. At the effective date of termination the claimant was aged 41 years. There was no evidence of any contractual entitlement to annual leave; accordingly the tribunal relied on the statutory provisions in that regard which are referred to below.
(c) The claimant was owed 3 days' wages at the date of termination of employment (for the Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday of that working week ending 31 January 2007). The tribunal also accepted that the claimant was owed a lying week on termination of this employment.
(d) The claimant's claim for holiday pay was for a figure of 2.3 days. In the absence of the claimant providing further detail in that regard, the tribunal had some difficulty in accepting that contention. There was no evidence as to the holiday year or other detail such as evidence of carry over of holiday entitlement from one calendar or leave year to the next. The tribunal was more inclined to accept that the claimant was owed 1.66 days' holiday pay from the commencement of the calendar year to the date of termination than the figure claimed. That is reflected in the calculations set out below.
(e) The claimant was dismissed on grounds of redundancy, apparently when the employer had ceased to trade. The tribunal did not need to determine any other findings of fact for the purposes of its decision in this case.
THE APPLICABLE LAW
(a) The deduction is required or authorised to be made by virtue of a statutory provision or a relevant provision of the worker's contract, or
(b) The worker has previously signified in writing his agreement or consent to the making of the deduction.
Article 55 of the 1996 Order provides that a worker may present a complaint to an industrial tribunal regarding an unauthorised deduction and Article 56 provides that a tribunal may find a complaint under Article 55 well-founded and shall make a declaration to that effect and shall order the employer to pay the worker the amount of any deduction made in contravention of Article 45.
THE TRIBUNAL'S DETERMINATION
4½ x 290 = £1305
4 x 275 = £1100
3 x 55 = £165
1 x 275 = £275
55 x 1.66 = £91.30
Chairman:
Date and place of hearing: 9 August 2007, Londonderry
Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties: