06632_09IT Mooney v D McAuley & Sons (Tiles & Tara... [2010] NIIT 06632_09IT (22 January 2010)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Mooney v D McAuley & Sons (Tiles & Tara... [2010] NIIT 06632_09IT (22 January 2010)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2010/06632_09IT.html
Cite as: [2010] NIIT 06632_09IT, [2010] NIIT 6632_9IT

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS

 

CASE REF:  6632/09

 

 

CLAIMANT:                      Michael Mooney

 

 

RESPONDENTS:              1.  D McAuley & Sons (Tiles & Taranzo) Ltd

                                        2.  Department for Employment & Learning

 

 

DECISION

The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that:-

 

          (a)      the claimant is entitled to unpaid wages of £368.51;

 

          (b)      the claimant is entitled to holiday pay of £102.37;

 

          (c)      the claimant is entitled to notice pay of £204.73;

 

(d)      the claimant was unfairly dismissed.  The tribunal awards the sum of £984.36.

 

Constitution of Tribunal:

Chairman:              Mr. P Kinney

Members:              Ms. V Walker

 

                              Mr. M Grant

Appearances:

 

The claimant was represented by D Carson LLB.

 

The respondent was not represented and did not appear.

 

The second respondent was represented by Mrs Baird, of Department for Employment & Learning.

 

Facts

1.       The claimant was employed by the first respondent from 10 September 2007 to 12 February 2009 when he was dismissed with immediate effect because of the financial difficulties faced by the first respondent.  The first respondent has ceased trading, but has not been made insolvent within the terms of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996.

 

2.       No dismissal procedure was followed by the first respondent.  The claimant was asked to leave the business premises on 12 February 2009 so that they could be locked up.

 

3.       At the date of dismissal the claimant’s gross weekly wage was £246.09 and his net weekly wage was £204.73.

 

4.       The claimant makes claims for unfair dismissal, unpaid wages, holiday pay and notice pay.  He is owed 9 days’ wages and 2½ days’ holiday pay.  He received Jobseeker’s Allowance of £64.30 per week.  He did not obtain new employment.  The claimant makes no claim for a compensatory payment in respect of his claim for unfair dismissal. 

 

5.       After hearing the evidence of the claimant the tribunal is satisfied his claims are well founded.  The tribunal makes the following awards.

 

Unfair Dismissal

 

6.       By virtue of Article 130A of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996, a dismissal is automatically unfair if a statutory disciplinary or dismissal procedure applies to it, the procedure has not been completed and non completion of the procedure is wholly or mainly attributable to failure by the employer.  In this case the statutory dismissal procedure did apply and the tribunal finds that non completion is attributable to failure by the employer.  The claimant’s claim for unfair dismissal is well-founded.  The claimant is entitled to a basic award of one week’s gross pay in the sum of £246.09.  However under Article 154(1A) of the 1996 Order, where the statutory dismissal procedure has not been complied with, and the amount of compensation available is less than four weeks’ pay, then the tribunal shall increase the award to four weeks’ pay unless the tribunal considers that the increase would result in injustice to the employer.  The tribunal awards four weeks’ pay in the sum of £984.37.   The claimant makes no claim for a compensatory award.  

 

Unpaid Wages

 

7.       The claimant is entitled to 9 days’ wages.  This entitlement is based on his net weekly wage of £204.73.  The claimant is entitled to £368.51 in respect of unpaid wages.

 

Holiday Pay

 

8.       The claimant is entitled 2½ days’ holiday pay.  This is based on his net weekly wage.  The claimant is therefore entitled to £102.37 in respect of holiday pay.

 

Notice Pay

 

9.       The claimant is entitled to 1 week’s notice pay, based on his net weekly wage, of £204.73.  There were no deductions during the notice period.  The claimant is therefore entitled to £204.73 in respect of notice pay.

 

10.     The claimant sought payment of the outstanding monies from Department for Employment & Learning (DEL).  DEL refused the application.  DEL has no liability for claims for unfair dismissal, unpaid wages, holiday pay or notice pay where the employer is not legally insolvent as defined in Article 228 of the 1996 Order.  The employer in this case is not legally solvent as defined in Article 228 and DEL has no liability unless and until the employer becomes insolvent.

 

Interest

 

This is a relevant decision for the purposes of the Industrial Tribunals (Interest) Order (Northern Ireland) 1990. 

 

 

 

 

 

Chairman:

 

 

Date and place of hearing:  10 December 2009, Belfast 

 

 

Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties:

 

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2010/06632_09IT.html