BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Russell v Department for Employment and ... Harrison Brooks Trading Limite... [2011] NIIT 02776_10IT (18 April 2011)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2011/02776_10IT.html
Cite as: [2011] NIIT 02776_10IT, [2011] NIIT 2776_10IT

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS

 

CASE REF:  2776/10         

 

 

 

CLAIMANT:                 Samantha Irene Anne Russell

 

 

RESPONDENTS:       1. Department for Employment and Learning

                                    2. Harrison Brooks Trading Limited

 

 

DECISION

The decision of the tribunal (Chairman sitting alone) is that the second named respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £1,067.28.        

 

Constitution of Tribunal:

Chairman (sitting alone):             Ms J Knight

                                   

 

Appearances:

 

The claimant was represented by Ms Helen Russell of James L Russell & Son Solicitors.

 

The first named respondent was represented by Mr Cruikshanks.

 

The second named respondent was not represented and did not appear.

 

 

1.                  The issue to be determined was whether the claimant is owed unpaid wages, notice pay and holiday pay by the second named respondent following the termination of her employment by the second named respondent.

 

2.                  I considered the originating claim form, the response of the first named respondent, the oral evidence of the claimant, an affidavit and supporting exhibits lodged on behalf of the claimant and a copy of the claimant’s claim for payments from the National Insurance Fund which was supplied by Mr Cruickshanks. No response was lodged on behalf of the second named respondent, which became legally insolvent on 7 June 2010.

 

3.                  The claimant was employed by the second named respondent from 6 September 2009 until her employment was terminated without notice on 30 December 2009. She was not paid for hours worked by her over the period 21 November 2009 until 21 December 2009. Her average gross weekly pay was 147.90 (£114.09 was the average net figure). At the effective date of termination the claimant had accrued holiday entitlement of 8.81 days. I am satisfied and the parties present agreed that the claimant is entitled to receive four weeks’ arrears of pay in the net sum of £456.36, 8.81 days holiday pay in the net sum of £201.03 and one week’s notice pay in the net sum of £114.09.

 

4.                  The claimant was not provided with a written statement of her terms and conditions of employment by her former employer and I therefore award her two weeks’ wages pursuant to Article 27(3) of the Employment Rights (NI) Order 1996 amounting to £295.80.

 

5.                  I therefore order the second named respondent to pay to the claimant the total sum of £1,067.28.

 

6.         This is a relevant payment for the purposes of the Industrial Tribunals (Interest) Order (Northern Ireland) 1990.

 

 

 

 

 

Chairman:

 

 

Date and place of hearing:    13 April 2011, Belfast

 

 

Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties:

        

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2011/02776_10IT.html