1437_13IT Caskey v David Hutchinson and Sons Ltd [2013] NIIT 01437_13IT (04 October 2013)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Caskey v David Hutchinson and Sons Ltd [2013] NIIT 01437_13IT (04 October 2013)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2013/1437_13IT.html
Cite as: [2013] NIIT 01437_13IT, [2013] NIIT 1437_13IT

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS

 

CASE REF:    1437/13 

 

 

 

CLAIMANT:                           Rodney Ian Caskey

 

 

RESPONDENT:                     David Hutchinson and Sons Ltd

 

 

 

DECISION

 

(A)      The claimant’s claim in respect of holiday pay is well-founded and it is ordered that the respondent company (“the Company”) shall pay to the claimant the sum of £360 in respect of holiday pay.

 

(B)      The claimant’s claim for notice pay is well-founded and it is ordered that the Company shall pay to the claimant the sum of £293 in respect of notice pay.

 

(C)     The claimant’s redundancy pay claim against the respondent is well-founded and it is declared that the Company is liable to make a redundancy payment of £7,560 to the claimant.

 

 

Constitution of Tribunal:

 

Chairman (sitting alone):      Mr P Buggy

 

 

Appearances:

 

The claimant was self-represented.

 

The Company was represented by Mr David Hutchinson.

 

 

 

REASONS

 

1.       Mr Hutchinson accepted that the claimant’s claims in respect of holiday pay, notice pay and redundancy pay were well-founded.  The only dispute in this case related to the amounts of holiday pay, notice pay and redundancy pay due to the claimant.  Mr Hutchinson argued that the amounts payable to the claimant should be based on the weekly amounts paid to him while he was on short-time working.  Mr Caskey argued that his holiday pay, notice pay and redundancy pay should be calculated on the basis of the weekly gross and net pay due to him during the period prior to the commencement of short-time working.

 

2.       The claimant was on short-time working for some time prior to the date of his dismissal.  However, I have awarded compensation based on his full-time wages, mainly for two reasons.  First, I have applied the principles which are set out in the Employment Appeal Tribunal judgment in Dutton  v Jones t/a Llandow Metals UKEAT/0236/12/ZT.  Secondly, I consider it to be far from clear that the Company had any contractual entitlement to impose short-time working upon this claimant.

 

3.       This Decision is based on the following information:

 

Gross weekly pay:

£360

 

 

Net weekly pay:

£293

 

 

Number of actual completed years of service:

27

 

 

Age on date of dismissal:

43

 

 

Multiplier (for redundancy pay):

21

 

 

 

4.       This is a relevant decision for the purposes of the Industrial Tribunals (Interest) Order (Northern Ireland) 1990.

 

 

 

 

 

Chairman:

 

 

Date and place of hearing:        16 September 2013, Belfast.

 

 

Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties:

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2013/1437_13IT.html