BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Oleskiewicz v Complete Newspaper Solutions L... John Shiels Janice Turkington [2013] NIIT 893_13IT (24 July 2013) URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2013/893_13IT.html Cite as: [2013] NIIT 893_13IT |
||
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS
CASE REF: 893/13
CLAIMANT: Zidzislaw Oleskiewicz
RESPONDENTS: 1. Complete Newspaper Solutions Ltd
2. John Shiels
3. Janice Turkington
DECISION
(A) The claimant withdrew his claims against John Shiels and the claims against Mr Shiels are accordingly dismissed.
(B) The claimant withdrew his claims against Janice Turkington and the claims against Ms Turkington are accordingly dismissed.
(C) The claimant’s wages claim against Complete Newspaper Solutions Ltd (“the company”) is well-founded and it is ordered that the company shall pay to the claimant the sum of £270 in respect of wages.
(D) The claimant’s holiday pay claim against the company is well-founded and it is ordered that the company shall pay to the claimant the sum of £88 in respect of holiday pay.
(E) The claimant’s claim for notice pay against the company is well-founded and it is ordered that the company shall pay to the claimant the sum of £180 in respect of notice pay.
(F) The claimant’s redundancy pay claim against the company is well-founded and it is declared that the company is liable to make a redundancy payment of £270 to the claimant.
Constitution of Tribunal:
Chairman (sitting alone): Mr Buggy
Appearances:
The claimant was self-represented.
The respondents were debarred from participating in the hearing because they did not present a response within the relevant time limit.
REASONS
1. I announced my decision at the end of the hearing. At the same time, I gave brief oral reasons for that decision.
2. This decision is based on the following information:
Gross weekly pay of £90
Net weekly pay of £90
Number of actual completed years of service: 2
Age on date of dismissal: 53
Multiplier (for redundancy pay): 3
3. “Complete Newspaper Solutions” was the original title, in these proceedings, of the first named respondent. During the course of this hearing, the claimant told me that he had been employed by Complete Newspaper Solutions Ltd and the title of the first named respondent was amended accordingly.
4. During the course of this hearing, the claimant accepted that he had been employed by the company, and not by Mr Shiels or by Ms Turkington. That is why he withdrew his proceedings against them.
5. This is a relevant decision for the purposes of the Industrial Tribunals (Interest) Order (Northern Ireland) 1990.
Chairman:
Date and place of hearing: 24 June 2013, Belfast.
Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties:
