BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Heirs of Ardross v Dishington. [1566] Mor 8938 (12 February 1566)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1566/Mor218938-047.html
Cite as: [1566] Mor 8938

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1566] Mor 8938      

Subject_1 MINOR.
Subject_2 SECT. III.

What a Minor can do without Consent of Curators.

Heirs of Ardross
v.
Dishington

Date: 12 February 1566
Case No. No 47.

A minor may warn, in order to removing, without consent of curators.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In the action of removing, moved by the Heirs of Ardross against Thomas Dishington, their father's brother, it was excepted, That the time of the warning the pursuers were minors, and warned not by the authority of their tutors; and the said Thomas was tutor testamentar, and so giving that they had warned lawfully, he could not be removed; because he, as lawful administrator and tutor, occupied the said lands, from which he was warned to flit. It was replied, That the said Thomas, before he was of lawful age to be tutor, intented an action of bastardy against the pupils, and thereafter intented an action upon the hail pupils' heritage; and, therefore, he should have no privilege of the said office, nor he could ever be tutor. It was answered, That, howbeit he had so done, he ought not to have been removed from his office, without a decree of a Judge; L. 4. Cod. In quibus casibus tutorem, vel curatorem habenti tutor vel curator dari potest. L. 27. § 1. D. De Testamentaria Tutela. It was found by the Lords, that minors might make warnings without consent of tutors, because it was to their profit; also it was found, that a tutor being nominated in testament, or otherwise, intenting actions either of bastardy or gear against the pupils, before that he accept of the office of tutory, he might never be tutor thereafter; and so the said pursuer was decerned never to have been a tutor to the said pupils, for the reasons foresaid.

Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 576. Maitland, MS. p. 210.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1566/Mor218938-047.html