BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Messrs Buchanans v Hunter Blair, &c. [1600] 5 Brn 487 (00 January 1600)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1600/Brn050487-0507.html
Cite as: [1600] 5 Brn 487

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1600] 5 Brn 487      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. reported by Alexander Tait, Clerk Of Session, One Of The Reporters For The Faculty.
Subject_2 INSURANCE.

Messrs Buchanans
v.
Hunter Blair, &c


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

A Cargo, in the ship Jeanie, belonging to Messrs Buchanans at Glasgow, having been insured for a voyage from the Bay of Honduras to London, instead of a voyage from the Bay of Honduras to Bristol, the voyage truly intended, but, by some mistake on the part of the insured, made out in the policy as above, the Judge-Admiral, in the first instance, and the Lords in a reduction, in the second instance, held the insurance as void; although it was contended, that this description of the voyage in the policy happened by mere mistake of the insured; and that the ship was lost on the Northern Triangles, not many hours sailing from the port in the Bay of Honduras; so that she was lost in the very same track which carried ships, as well from Honduras to London, as to Bristol. But the Lords, in considering this question, did not look upon this case as depending upon the point, whether or not there was any deviation from the voyage, for the truth was, there was no deviation; but it turned upon this, that one voyage had been insured, and another undertaken: so that the contract was void. And so the Lords found.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1600/Brn050487-0507.html