BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The Governors of Heriot's Hospital v Walter Ferguson. [1600] 5 Brn 559 (00 January 1600)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1600/Brn050559-0636.html
Cite as: [1600] 5 Brn 559

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1600] 5 Brn 559      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. reported by ALEXANDER TAIT, CLERK OF SESSION, one of the reporters for the faculty.
Subject_2 PROPERTY.

The Governors of Heriot's Hospital
v.
Walter Ferguson


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

John Cleland, in the year 1784, feued, from Heriot's Hospital, about five acres of land, formerly called Broughton-loan-head, and in his charter was the following clause:—

“Providing always, likeas it is hereby provided and declared, that it shall not be leisome to the said John Cleland and his foresaids, to dig for stones, coal, sand, or any other thing within the said ground, nor to use the same in any other way than by the ordinary labour of plough and spade without, the express consent and liberty of the Governors of the said Hospital, had and obtained to that effect.”

Walter Ferguson became purchaser of this feu, which being in the neighbourhood of the extended royalty of the town of Edinburgh, he prepared to build a square upon it. This was opposed by the Governors of Heriot's Hospital, apprehending that it might interfere with the interest of the city of Edinburgh, in feuing their grounds of the extended royalty. They presented a bill of suspension to stop Mr Ferguson's building. The bill was refused by Lord Auchinleck, and afterwards by the Court: and, last of all, upon an appeal, the decree was affirmed.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1600/Brn050559-0636.html