BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Blacklock v Alexander Goldie. [1600] 5 Brn 584 (00 January 1600) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1600/Brn050584-0681.html Cite as: [1600] 5 Brn 584 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1600] 5 Brn 584
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. reported by ALEXANDER TAIT, CLERK OF SESSION, one of the reporters for the faculty.
Subject_2 SALE.
Blacklock
v.
Alexander Goldie
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the case of a minute of sale, where the seller becomes bound to grant a disposition with procuratory and precept, and the purchaser, on the other hand, becomes bound to pay the price, the right is not completely vested in the purchaser, nor is the one party entitled to force implement of the transaction, until he himself is ready to implement his part. In such a case, fides non est habita de pretio, nor is the property transferred. But, where the seller dispones the lands de presenti, with warrant to take infeftment, and takes the purchaser bound to pay the price at the agreed terms, nothing more remains to be done on the part of the seller; but the purchaser can take infeftment when he pleases, and, by doing so, the full property is vested in him. In this case, fides habita est de pretio, and the seller relies entirely upon the personal security of the purchaser for his payment. The seller has no preference upon the subjects to the other creditors.
According to these principles, the Court decided in a case betwixt Blacklock and Alexander Goldie, Writer to the Signet; See 4 New Coll., p. 290. Goldie purchased Blacklock’s lands, and was intrusted by Blacklock to write out the disposition. He did so. The disposition bore, that the price was paid and receipt granted for it; but, instead thereof, Goldie gave his bond for the price, upon a narrative, that, though the disposition bore that it was paid, yet it was not paid. He took infeftment. His affairs afterwards went into some confusion,—but the Lords found, that, in this case, fides habita erat de pretio, and that Blacklock was entitled to no preference. No creditors interfered: the question was with Mr Goldie.
The judgment went upon this, that Blacklock was totally denuded in favour of Goldie, and that too by infeftment; and the security of the records requires, that rights of lands should not be incumbered by latent personal deeds.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
