BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Thomas Sheddon v Hugh Sproul Crawford. [1600] 5 Brn 639 (00 January 1600) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1600/Brn050639-0785.html Cite as: [1600] 5 Brn 639 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1600] 5 Brn 639
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. reported by ALEXANDER TAIT, CLERK OF SESSION, one of the reporters for the faculty.
Subject_2 WRIT.
Thomas Sheddon
v.
Hugh Sproul Crawford
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action for making effectual a sale of lands on a minute of sale, Thomas Sheddon contra Hugh Sproul Crawford, the objection was, that, in the deed pursued on, neither the writer nor witnesses were designed, and therefore it was null on the Act 1681; and further, was not written upon stamped paper. Answered,—The deed was holograph of Mr Sproul Crawford, who challenged it, and was also homologated by several steps taken by Mr Sheddon, the purchaser, to carry it into execution. The Lord Auchinleck, Ordinary, found the deed null, and the Lords adhered.
In this case Crawford at once owned, not only that he had subscribed the deed, but that he had wrote it. See 4 New Coll., p. 309.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
