BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Wardlaw v Wardlaw. [1607] Mor 7153 (28 February 1607) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1607/Mor1707153-028.html Cite as: [1607] Mor 7153 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1607] Mor 7153
Subject_1 INTERDICTION.
Subject_2 SECT. IV. Interdicter may not be auctor in rem. suam. - Manner of adhibiting the Interdicter's consent. - Effect of the Death of the Interdicter.
Date: Wardlaw
v.
Wardlaw
28 February 1607
Case No.No 28.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
George Wardlaw pursued Robert Wardlaw upon his obligation; he excepted the obligation was null, because it was made by him to the said George, to whom he was interdicted at the time of the making thereof. It was answered, That could not come in by exception, but behoved to be reduced. The Lords found, that, albeit an obligation, made by a person interdicted to a stranger, was not null by exception, but behoved to be reduced; yet the nullities of an obligation, made to his own interdicter, might be received by exception, because he would qualify sufficiently quod fuerat in rem versum.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting