BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Douglas v Lord Buccleugh. [1610] Mor 6681 (25 July 1610)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1610/Mor1606681-095.html
Cite as: [1610] Mor 6681

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1610] Mor 6681      

Subject_1 IMPROBATION.
Subject_2 SECT. IV.

Who must satisfy Production. - What terms allowed for Production. What incumbent on the Defender. - What his Privileges.

Douglas
v.
Lord Buccleugh

Date: 25 July 1610
Case No. No 95.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In an action of improbation pursued by Sir James Douglas of Drumlanrig, knight, against Walter Lord Scott of Buccleugh, for exhibition of his writs of the barony of Hawick, granted to him and his predecessors by the King's Majesty, and his Highness's predecessors, it was alleged, that seeing the pursuer's infeftments were, in anno 1509, granted by King James IV. upon the recognition, that the Lords cannot compel the Lord Buccleugh to produce any infeftments granted by the Kings before that time. To the which it was answered, That the allegeance ought to be repelled, except they would condescend upon some right granted by the Kings for the time, before the same year 1509; in which case, if they would produce the same, the Lords would take order for all others not produced; otherwise certification ought to be granted, as was decided betwixt the Earl of Glencairn and the Earl of Home. * ——— The Lords repelled the allegeance, and declared that if they would not produce an infeftment under the Great Seal, before the said year 1509, that they would consider of the allegeance.

Kerse, MS. fol. 204.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1610/Mor1606681-095.html