BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Home v Pringle. [1610] Mor 6687 (22 Novembers 1610)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1610/Mor1606687-109.html
Cite as: [1610] Mor 6687

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

[1610] Mor 6687      
Subject_1 IMPROBATION.
Subject_2 SECT. V.

In what cases Extracts sustained to satisfy production. - When condescendence of the writs called for is sufficient. - Transumpts.

Home
 v.
Pringle

Date: 22 Novembers 1610
Case No. No 109.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In an action pursued by Thomas Home, brother to Coldingknows, against James Pringle of Whytbank, it was found that Whytbank might improve the extract of the horning, albeit the principal was not produced.

 Kerse, MS. fol. 204.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1610/Mor1606687-109.html