BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sir Robert Douglas v Lord Herries. [1612] Mor 11228 (2 July 1612) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1612/Mor2711228-403.html Cite as: [1612] Mor 11228 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1612] Mor 11228
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION XV. Interruption of the Negative Prescription.
Subject_3 SECT. I. What diligence sufficient. - Effect of partial interruption.
Date: Sir Robert Douglas
v.
Lord Herries
2 July 1612
Case No.No 403.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords found that a summons of removing raised within three years interrupts the prescription; notwithstanding it was alleged the said summons was passed from pro loco et tempore; and yet the Lord Herries could not have compelled them to have insisted upon the warning.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting