BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Primrose v Dury. [1612] Mor 14326 (22 December 1612)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1612/Mor3314326-020.html
Cite as: [1612] Mor 14326

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

[1612] Mor 14326      
Subject_1 SASINE.
Subject_2 SECT. IV.

Clause, vidi scivi et audivi. - Clause, acta erant hæc.

Primrose
 v.
Dury

Date: 22 December 1612
Case No. No. 20.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In an action betwixt James Primrose and Dury, the Lords found a sasine null, because it wanted these words in the subscription, “quia novi, vidi, scivi, et audivi.”

 Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 363. Kerse MS. p. 77.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1612/Mor3314326-020.html