BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Mr.David Ogilvy v Napier. [1612] Mor 15786 (22 January 1612)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1612/Mor3615786-008.html
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action for proving tenor pursued by Mr. David Ogilvy against William Napier, the Lords found no necessity to libel an adminicle in writ.
Kerse MS. p. 187.*** This case is reported by Haddington:
In probation of a tenor, casus amissionis is not necessarily and precisely to be proved. Neither do all deeds necessarily require adminicles in writ, because acquittances and writs of that nature hardly admit adminicles.
The pursuer may protest for exhibition of a writ to prove a summons, exception, and reply: Albeit it should not be by way of incident, he may call for it via actionis, and his action will be sustained.
