BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Edmonston v Hamilton. [1616] Mor 12302 (19 March 1616)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1616/Mor2912302-058.html
Cite as: [1616] Mor 12302

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

[1616] Mor 12302      
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I.

Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. III.

What Proof relavant to take away Writ.

Edmonston
 v.
Hamilton

Date: 19 March 1616
Case No. No 58.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In a reduction of a decreet of removing, pursued by William Edmonston against John Hamilton of Kinaber, the Lords found a reason relevant upon a promise made, that he should bruik for an year, which promise was made after the warning, and before the sentence, relevant to be proved by witnesses.

 Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 220. Kerse, MS. fol. 189.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1616/Mor2912302-058.html