BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
A. v B. [1618] Mor 6688 (4 March 1618)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1618/Mor1606688-111.html Cite as:
[1618] Mor 6688
In what cases Extracts sustained to satisfy production. - When condescendence of the writs called for is sufficient. - Transumpts.
A v. B
Date: 4 March 1618 Case No. No 111.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
It was alleged, That retours cannot be produced before the act of Parliament 1617, seeing they cannot be reduced conform to the act made by Ja. IV. Parl. 5th, cap. 57. The Lords repelled the allegeance, and declared they would rot extend the words of the said act, made anent reductions of retours, to improbation of them.
