BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> E. Melross v L. Bass. [1623] Mor 12510 (25 November 1623) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1623/Mor2912510-379.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION III. Public Instrument, how far Probative.
Subject_3 SECT. III. Instrument of Sasine.
Date: E Melross
v.
L Bass.
25 November 1623
Case No.No 379.
A sasine by hasp and staple is a sufficient proof against an heir, of his entry, to subject him passive to all his father's debts. It is likewise sustained as an active title.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
This day it was controverted amongst the Lords, if a sasine given to a party, of land within burgh, as heir to his predecessor, by the Bailie and Clerk, by hesp and staple, as use is in burgh, should verify the person so seized, to be heir to his predecessor active, without any preceding warrant, and service of court, cognoscing him to be heir. The cause of the doubt was, because such sasines could not be of another nature than sasines which proceed upon precepts of clare constat, which are granted by other superiors, and which prove not active for the receivers, but passive against them; but it was not doubted, but that the foresaid sasines in burgh gave the party right to the land, only it was controverted, if it was sufficient to furnish him action, as heir to that predecessor in other causes; but it were of a dangerous consequence not to find them to prove active as well as passive.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting