BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Thomas Hope and Thomas Nicolson v James Nicolson. [1626] 1 Brn 38 (28 November 1626) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1626/Brn010038-0077.html Cite as: [1626] 1 Brn 38 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1626] 1 Brn 38
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR ALEXANDER GIBSON, OF DURIE.
Date: Thomas Hope and Thomas Nicolson
v.
James Nicolson
28 November 1626 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Mr Thomas Hope and Mr Thomas Nicolson having uplifted some sums of money pertaining to umquhile Mr Thomas Nicolson, which he had laid on land, and having paid the same to a creditor of the said Mr Thomas, they procured from that creditor an assignation, in their favours, of that bond made to the creditor, which they procured for their security, and warrandice of a renunciation made by Mr James Nicolson, son to the said umquhile Mr Thomas, of these sums, upon land, uplifted by them, as said is; in the which renunciation they were obliged to cause the said Mr James ratify the same at his majority:—When this assignation was so made by the creditor, the said Mr James, who should have returned the assignation with the principal bond, which was paid, and with the returning whereof he was intrusted,—ignorantly, being a minor, cancelled his father's name out of the bond, not knowing what of law was to be done: whereupon, he being convened for the said cancellation, at the instance of the said Mr Thomas Hope and Mr Thomas Nicolson, who are bound for him as cautioners foresaid, and who, for their relief, acquired the said assignation, to hear and see the premises verified, and therefore, that the said bond cancelled by him should make as great faith against him as when it was whole;—the Lords sustained this pursuit summarily, upon a supplication executed against him, but further process to be proven by his own oath; and by his oath found it proven against him, to infer the foresaid conclusion, seeing it was only craved against himself, and no other, albeit he was a minor. And though that it was doubted, if such a sentence upon his own confession, being minor, could be valid; but being in facto suo et in quasi maleficio, and only craved against himself, and he not opponing thereto, the Lords decerned; likeas, after the pronouncing of the sentence, the said Mr James compeared personally before the Lords, and by his great oath being sworn, made faith that he should never come against the sentence; whereupon the pursuers asked instruments, partibus præsentibus.
Gibson, Clerk. Page 238.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
