BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> William Douglas v The Parishioners of Haymouth. [1627] 1 Brn 232 (14 February 1627) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1627/Brn010232-0527.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR GEORGE AUCHINLECK OF BALMANNO.
Date: William Douglas
v.
The Parishioners of Haymouth
14 February 1627 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Warning made at Coldingham, whereof the kirk of Haymouth is a pendicle, was sustained by the Lords, although the warning was not made at Haymouth, notwithstanding the kirk of Haymouth was erected by the king into a parish kirk, and the same was planted with a minister, and the Word and sacraments had been used there divers years before the warning; because no new parish kirk can be erected but by Act of Parliament.
Page 116.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting