BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Caruthers v Johnstoun. [1627] 1 Brn 238 (23 November 1627) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1627/Brn010238-0559.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR GEORGE AUCHINLECK OF BALMANNO.
Date: Caruthers
v.
Johnstoun
23 November 1627 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an improbation, the defender craves a diligence for writs in general, because the summons of improbation was general. The Lords would not sustain the diligence, except the defender condescended upon the particular writs to be contained in the diligence.
Page 52.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
